Literature DB >> 17337458

Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery.

Omer Aziz1, Christopher Rao, Sukhmeet Singh Panesar, Catherine Jones, Stephen Morris, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery bypass and percutaneous coronary artery stenting as primary interventions for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised comparative peer reviewed publications. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Health Technology Assessment databases (1966-2005). REVIEW
METHODS: Studies comparing the two procedures as the primary intervention for isolated left anterior descending artery stenosis were identified and the following extracted: study design, population characteristics, severity of coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, and outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: 12 studies (1952 patients) reporting results from eight groups were included: one was a retrospective design, one prospective non-randomised, and six prospective randomised. Meta-analysis of randomised trials showed a higher rate of recurrence of angina (odds ratio 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 5.21), incidence of major adverse coronary and cerebral events (2.86, 1.62 to 5.08), and need for repeat revascularisation (4.63, 2.52 to 8.51) with percutaneous stenting. No significant difference was found in myocardial infarction, stroke, or mortality at maximum follow-up between interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery bypass for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery resulted in fewer complications in the mid-term compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary artery stenting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337458      PMCID: PMC1832008          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39106.476215.BE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement.

Authors:  D. Moher; D.J. Cook; S. Eastwood; I. Olkin; D. Rennie; D.F. Stroup
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2000-12

2.  ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Controversies in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Lionel H Opie; Patrick J Commerford; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alain Joel Nordmann; Matthias Briel; Heiner Claudins Bucher
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Cost effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery.

Authors:  Christopher Rao; Omer Aziz; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Catherine Jones; Stephen Morris; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-02

6.  Misleading meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

7.  Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; J C Cappelleri; J Lau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

9.  Mortality and myocardial infarction following surgical versus percutaneous revascularization of isolated left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Munir Boodhwani; Fraser D Rubens; Frank W Sellke; Thierry G Mesana; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  A comparison of coronary artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: five year clinical follow up.

Authors:  F Versaci; A Gaspardone; F Tomai; I Proietti; A S Ghini; L Altamura; G Andò; F Crea; P A Gioffrè; L Chiariello
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery.

Authors:  Christopher Rao; Omer Aziz; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Catherine Jones; Stephen Morris; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-02

2.  Coronary revascularisation.

Authors:  David P Taggart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-24

3.  PCI or CABG: which patients and at what cost?

Authors:  Tony Gershlick; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  To stent or not to stent?: A sterile debate.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Keith Channon; Adrian Banning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-21

Review 5.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events.

Authors:  Jane S Skinner; Angela Cooper
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 7.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Management standards for stable coronary artery disease in India.

Authors:  Sundeep Mishra; Saumitra Ray; Jamshed J Dalal; J P S Sawhney; S Ramakrishnan; Tiny Nair; S S Iyengar; V K Bahl
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-12-09

9.  Mid-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Seo; Jun Sung Kim; Kay-Hyun Park; Cheong Lim; Su Ryeun Chung; Dong Jung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

10.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization. The step towards hybrid procedures.

Authors:  Jacek Piątek; Anna Kędziora; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Grzegorz Kiełbasa; Marta Olszewska; Krzysztof Wróbel; Bryan HyoChan Song; Tomasz Darocha; Marcin Wróżek; Bogusław Kapelak
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.