Literature DB >> 17337355

Background levels of key biomarkers of chemical exposure within the UK general population--pilot study.

L S Levy1, K Jones, J Cocker, F L Assem, A C Capleton.   

Abstract

The use of biomarkers is now an accepted measure of chemical uptake (possibly exposure) in risk assessment. However, information on background exposures and biomarker concentrations of many environmental chemicals in the general UK population is limited. This study aims to determine reference ranges for eleven biomarkers of chemical exposure, measurable in urine, within the general adult UK population. The study will involve 400 volunteers throughout the UK and is currently underway. Described here is a pilot study, carried out during August and September 2005 to test the study methodology. The initial results of the postal survey and urinary concentrations for cadmium (UCd) and mercury (UHg) are reported. A total of 78 individuals were recruited by post from the UK Electoral Register, to take part in the pilot study. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire and provide a urine sample. The overall response rate was 16%, of which 60.3% were female and 39.7% male. Those living in suburban areas accounted for 60% of respondents, current smokers 12.8% and vegetarians 1.3%. Levels of UCd were higher in females compared to males and smoking status influenced levels; smokers displayed higher levels of UCd than individuals who had previously smoked or who had never smoked. The mean, median and range of UHg was 1.12, 0.55 (<limit of detection (LD)-13.46) microg/g creatinine, respectively. This pilot study shows that postal sampling may be a useful and cost effective method for carrying out biomonitoring studies using urine as the matrix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337355     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  7 in total

1.  Methylmercury and elemental mercury differentially associate with blood pressure among dental professionals.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Goodrich; Yi Wang; Brenda Gillespie; Robert Werner; Alfred Franzblau; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Worrying exposure to trace elements in the population of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Authors:  J Tuakuila; D Lison; A-C Lantin; F Mbuyi; G Deumer; V Haufroid; P Hoet
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Towards the development of a multidisciplinary understanding of the effects of toxic chemical mixtures on health.

Authors:  Alex G Stewart; Joy Carter
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Biomonitoring of metals and trace elements in urine of central Ethiopian populations.

Authors:  Tewodros Rango Godebo; Christopher J Paul; Marc A Jeuland; Redda Tekle-Haimanot
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.840

5.  Biological monitoring of pesticide exposures in residents living near agricultural land.

Authors:  Karen S Galea; Laura MacCalman; Kate Jones; John Cocker; Paul Teedon; Anne J Sleeuwenhoek; John W Cherrie; Martie van Tongeren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Assessment of exposure to soils contaminated with lead, cadmium, and arsenic near a zinc smelter, Cassiopée Study, France, 2008.

Authors:  Cécile Durand; Nicolas Sauthier; Valérie Schwoebel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Engaging with Community Researchers for Exposure Science: Lessons Learned from a Pesticide Biomonitoring Study.

Authors:  Paul Teedon; Karen S Galea; Laura MacCalman; Kate Jones; John Cocker; John W Cherrie; Martie van Tongeren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.