Literature DB >> 17337307

Non-commercial poultry industries: surveys of backyard and gamefowl breeder flocks in the United States.

L Garber1, G Hill, J Rodriguez, G Gregory, L Voelker.   

Abstract

The National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) Poultry '04 study was conducted to better describe non-commercial United States poultry populations, in particular, backyard and gamefowl breeder flocks. To estimate the density of backyard flocks in close proximity to commercial operations, a sample of 350 commercial poultry operations in 18 top poultry producing states was selected from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) list of poultry operations. A 1 mile radius circle was drawn around each operation, and door-to-door canvassing was conducted within these circles to enumerate premises with all species of birds. Premises with backyard poultry flocks completed a questionnaire focusing on bird health, bird movement, and biosecurity practices. A similar questionnaire, provided in both English and Spanish, was mailed to all members of State affiliates of the United Gamefowl Breeders Association (UGBA) as well as to members of State associations not affiliated with UGBA. An average of 29.4 residences was found within a 1 mile radius of commercial operations, of which 1.9 residences per circle had backyard poultry flocks. Gamefowl breeder flocks were larger, used more health care and biosecurity practices, and moved birds more frequently compared to backyard flocks.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337307     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  13 in total

Review 1.  Raising chickens in city backyards: the public health role.

Authors:  S L Pollock; C Stephen; N Skuridina; T Kosatsky
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

2.  How backyard poultry flocks influence the effort required to curtail avian influenza epidemics in commercial poultry flocks.

Authors:  G Smith; S Dunipace
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Risky business in Georgia's wild birds: contact rates between wild birds and backyard chickens is influenced by supplemental feed.

Authors:  A J Ayala; L K Haas; B M Williams; S S Fink; M J Yabsley; S M Hernandez
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Environmental and demographic determinants of avian influenza viruses in waterfowl across the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Matthew L Farnsworth; Ryan S Miller; Kerri Pedersen; Mark W Lutman; Seth R Swafford; Philip D Riggs; Colleen T Webb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measuring the costs of biosecurity on poultry farms: a case study in broiler production in Finland.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maarit Siekkinen; Jaakko Heikkilä; Niina Tammiranta; Heidi Rosengren
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  Health surveillance of a potential bridge host: Pathogen exposure risks posed to avian populations augmented with captive-bred pheasants.

Authors:  Ian A Dwight; Peter S Coates; Simone T Stoute; Maurice E Pitesky
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.521

7.  Questionnaire study and postmortem findings in backyard chicken flocks in Finland.

Authors:  Leena Pohjola; Laila Rossow; Anita Huovilainen; Timo Soveri; Marja-Liisa Hänninen; Maria Fredriksson-Ahomaa
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 8.  Biosecurity measures for backyard poultry in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Conan; Flavie Luce Goutard; San Sorn; Sirenda Vong
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Using quantitative disease dynamics as a tool for guiding response to avian influenza in poultry in the United States of America.

Authors:  K M Pepin; E Spackman; J D Brown; K L Pabilonia; L P Garber; J T Weaver; D A Kennedy; K A Patyk; K P Huyvaert; R S Miller; A B Franklin; K Pedersen; T L Bogich; P Rohani; S A Shriner; C T Webb; S Riley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Evaluation of egg production after adoption of biosecurity strategies by backyard poultry farmers in West Bengal.

Authors:  I Samanta; S N Joardar; D Ganguli; P K Das; U Sarkar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.