Literature DB >> 17337304

Immune responses to an Eimeria acervulina infection in different broilers lines.

W J C Swinkels1, J Post, J B Cornelissen, B Engel, W J A Boersma, J M J Rebel.   

Abstract

The (T-cell) immune responses of two different broiler lines to a primary Eimeria acervulina infection were investigated. The lines used were a commercial fast-growing broiler line and a slow-growing type of broiler as used in organic farming. Seven-day-old broilers of both lines were infected with 5 x 10(4) oocysts of E. acervulina. The animals were weighed and a species-specific real-time PCR was used to quantify the total amount of parasites in the duodenum. In the fast-growing line, a lower parasite load was seen from day 4 onwards compared to the slow-growing line. In both lines the intestinal peak of Eimeria DNA was observed at day 5 post infection (p.i.). In the duodenum no increase in CD4(+) T-cells was found in both infected lines, but a fast increase in CD8(+) T-cells was observed in the fast-growing line. At day 3 p.i. in the slow-growing broilers an IL-18 mRNA response was observed. At day 4 p.i. strong IFN-gamma and IL-8 mRNA responses were found in both lines. No IL-4 mRNA responses were found in the duodenum. In conclusion, both lines have different growth rates and control and infected conditions. Based on the kinetics of observed phenomena a primary infection with E. acervulina in 7-day-old broilers seems to generate an early CD8alpha(+) response in fast-growing broilers compared to the slow-growing broilers. This difference in immune reaction after an E. acervulina infection could result in a different Eimeria load in the duodenum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337304     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  4 in total

1.  Behavior and Immune Response of Conventional and Slow-Growing Broilers to Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  Ashlyn M Snyder; Sean P Riley; Cara I Robison; Darrin M Karcher; Carmen L Wickware; Timothy A Johnson; Shawna L Weimer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Kinetics of the Cellular and Transcriptomic Response to Eimeria maxima in Relatively Resistant and Susceptible Chicken Lines.

Authors:  Abi Bremner; Sungwon Kim; Katrina M Morris; Matthew John Nolan; Dominika Borowska; Zhiguang Wu; Fiona Tomley; Damer P Blake; Rachel Hawken; Pete Kaiser; Lonneke Vervelde
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Does selection for growth rate in broilers affect their resistance and tolerance to Eimeria maxima?

Authors:  Panagiotis Sakkas; Idiegberanoise Oikeh; Damer P Blake; Matthew J Nolan; Richard A Bailey; Anthony Oxley; Ivan Rychlik; Georg Lietz; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Dietary supplementation with anti-IL-10 antibody during a severe Eimeria challenge in broiler chickens.

Authors:  M S Abdul Rasheed; U P Tiwari; M L Oelschlager; B N Smith; J C Jespersen; J Escobar; N Olmeda-Geniec; R N Dilger
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.