Literature DB >> 17335735

[Value of the ankle-brachial index in cardiovascular risk stratification of patients without known atherotrombotic disease. MERITO study].

Luis Manzano1, José María Mostaza, Carmen Suárez, Marc Cairols, Rubén Redondo, Pedro Valdivielso, Rafael Monte, Julio César Blázquez, Eva María Ferreira, Isabel Trouillhet, Jesús J González-Igual, Miguel A Sánchez-Zamorano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease detected by measurement of ankle-brachial index enables the identification of asymptomatic patients with target organ damage. We have investigated the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (ankle-brachial index < 0.9), and its potential clinical-therapeutic impact, in patients without known atherotrombotic disease from internal medicine practices. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: It was a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study. Outpatients aged 50 through 80 years, with either diabetes or a SCORE risk estimation of at least 3%, were enrolled.
RESULTS: A total of 1,519 subjects (58% men) were evaluated, 917 with diabetes (61%). The mean age (standard deviation) was 66.2 (8.3) years. The prevalence of an ankle-brachial index < 0.9 was 26.19%. In multiple logistic regressions the risk factors associated to an ankle-brachial index < 0.9 were age, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, macroalbuminuria, and heart rate. There was a significant relationship between the ankle-brachial index and the SCORE risk estimation. With respect to the therapeutic aims of the patients with an ankle-brachial index < 0.9, only 21% were taking antiplatelet drugs, 26% showed low density lipoproteins-cholesterol values < 100 mg/dl (53% < 130 mg/dl), and 16% displayed recommended blood pressure levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of ankle-brachial is useful to reclassify as high risk a significant proportion of patients without known previous atherotrombotic disease. The ankle-brachial index should be incorporated into routine cardiovascular evaluation, particularly in subjects with diabetes or a score risk assessment > or = 3%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17335735     DOI: 10.1157/13099239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   1.725


  4 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral arterial disease, type 2 diabetes and postprandial lipidaemia: Is there a link?

Authors:  Pedro Valdivielso; José Ramírez-Bollero; Carmen Pérez-López
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  The peripheral arterial disease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population.

Authors:  María Teresa Alzamora; Rosa Forés; José Miguel Baena-Díez; Guillem Pera; Pere Toran; Marta Sorribes; Marisa Vicheto; María Dolores Reina; Amparo Sancho; Carlos Albaladejo; Judith Llussà
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A Study on the Relationship between Serum Beta 2-Microglobulin Levels, Underlying Chronic Kidney Disease, and Peripheral Arterial Disease in High-Vascular-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Diego Real de Asúa; Ramón Puchades; Iluminada García-Polo; Carmen Suárez
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2012-12-15

4.  Prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and factors associated: An epidemiological analysis from the population-based Screening PRE-diabetes and type 2 DIAbetes (SPREDIA-2) study.

Authors:  V Cornejo Del Río; J Mostaza; C Lahoz; V Sánchez-Arroyo; C Sabín; S López; P Patrón; P Fernández-García; B Fernández-Puntero; D Vicent; L Montesano-Sánchez; F García-Iglesias; T González-Alegre; E Estirado; F Laguna; C de Burgos-Lunar; P Gómez-Campelo; J C Abanades-Herranz; J M de Miguel-Yanes; M A Salinero-Fort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.