Literature DB >> 17335313

Cost-effectiveness measures, methods, and policy implications from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) for schizophrenia.

Robert A Rosenheck1, Jeffrey A Lieberman.   

Abstract

Sales of atypical antipsychotics have expanded rapidly as their use for treatment of schizophrenia and other illnesses has increased. The CATIE trial was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these medications. Cost-effectiveness analysis in CATIE examined the benefits and costs of treatments and attempted to determine whether one treatment would result in better outcomes and lower costs than another one. While the data from CATIE on cost-effectiveness have not been analyzed yet, it is still possible to consider the potential implications of the analysis, including how the roles of researchers and stakeholders should be considered in deciding optimal clinical practices and public policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17335313     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.0207e05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  5 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in action: the role of passive personalization in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; Anupam B Jena; Dana P Goldman; Tomas J Philipson; Robert Dubois
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  First-Episode Services for Psychotic Disorders in the U.S. Public Sector: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Vinod H Srihari; Cenk Tek; Suat Kucukgoncu; Vivek H Phutane; Nicholas J K Breitborde; Jessica Pollard; Banu Ozkan; John Saksa; Barbara C Walsh; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Tying comparative effectiveness information to decision-making and the future of comparative effectiveness research designs: the case for antipsychotic drugs.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; Herbert Y Meltzer
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Predictive validity of conversion from the clinical high risk syndrome to frank psychosis.

Authors:  Laura A Yoviene Sykes; Maria Ferrara; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Diana O Perkins; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan; Kristen A Woodberry; Albert R Powers; Allison N Ponce; John D Cahill; Jessica M Pollard; Vinod H Srihari; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Reducing the duration of untreated psychosis and its impact in the U.S.: the STEP-ED study.

Authors:  Vinod H Srihari; Cenk Tek; Jessica Pollard; Suzannah Zimmet; Jane Keat; John D Cahill; Suat Kucukgoncu; Barbara C Walsh; Fangyong Li; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Nina Levine; Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately; Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian; Larry J Seidman; Matcheri S Keshavan; Thomas H McGlashan; Scott W Woods
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.