Literature DB >> 17335003

Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials.

Dmitry Rykunov1, András Fiser.   

Abstract

Statistical distance dependent pair potentials are frequently used in a variety of folding, threading, and modeling studies of proteins. The applicability of these types of potentials is tightly connected to the reliability of statistical observations. We explored the possible origin and extent of false positive signals in statistical potentials by analyzing their distance dependence in a variety of randomized protein-like models. While on average potentials derived from such models are expected to equal zero at any distance, we demonstrate that systematic and significant distortions exist. These distortions originate from the limited statistical counts in local environments of proteins and from the limited size of protein structures at large distances. We suggest that these systematic errors in statistical potentials are connected to the dependence of amino acid composition on protein size and to variation in protein sizes. Additionally, atom-based potentials are dominated by a false positive signal that is due to correlation among distances measured from atoms of one residue to atoms of another residue. The significance of residue-based pairwise potentials at various spatial pair separations was assessed in this study and it was found that as few as approximately 50% of potential values were statistically significant at distances below 4 A, and only at most approximately 80% of them were significant at larger pair separations. A new definition for reference state, free of the observed systematic errors, is suggested. It has been demonstrated to generate statistical potentials that compare favorably to other publicly available ones. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17335003     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  36 in total

1.  3DRobot: automated generation of diverse and well-packed protein structure decoys.

Authors:  Haiyou Deng; Ya Jia; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Analyses on hydrophobicity and attractiveness of all-atom distance-dependent potentials.

Authors:  Matsuyuki Shirota; Takashi Ishida; Kengo Kinoshita
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Effects of surface-to-volume ratio of proteins on hydrophilic residues: decrease in occurrence and increase in buried fraction.

Authors:  Matsuyuki Shirota; Takashi Ishida; Kengo Kinoshita
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.

Authors:  Aron Broom; Zachary Jacobi; Kyle Trainor; Elizabeth M Meiering
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  QAcon: single model quality assessment using protein structural and contact information with machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Renzhi Cao; Badri Adhikari; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Miao Sun; Jie Hou; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Improved scoring function for comparative modeling using the M4T method.

Authors:  Dmitry Rykunov; Elliot Steinberger; Carlos J Madrid-Aliste; András Fiser
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2008-11-05

8.  New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions.

Authors:  Dmitry Rykunov; Andras Fiser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.