OBJECTIVE: We investigated the correlation of antimyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-(anti-MOG) and anti-myelin basic protein antibodies (anti-MBP) in serum of CIS patients with inflammatory signs in MRI and in CSF and, as previously suggested,the incidence of more frequent and rapid progression to clinically definite MS (CDMS). METHODS: 133CIS patients were analysed for anti-MOG and anti-MBP (Western blot). Routine CSF and cranial MRI (quantitatively and qualitatively) measures were analyzed. 55 patients had a follow-up of at least 12 months or until conversion to CDMS. RESULTS: Patients with anti-MOG and anti-MBP had an increased intrathecal IgG production and CSF white blood cell count(p = 0.048 and p = 0.036). When anti-MBP alone, or both antibodies were present the cranial MRI showed significantly more T2 lesions (p = 0.007 and p = 0.01,respectively). There was a trend for more lesion dissemination in anti-MBP positive patients (p = 0.076).Conversely, anti-MOG- and/or anti-MBP failed to predict conversion to CDMS in our follow-up group (n = 55). Only in female patients with at least one MRI lesion (n = 34) did the presence of anti-MOG correlate with more frequent (p = 0.028) and more rapid (p = 0.0209) transition to CDMS. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of anti-MOG or anti-MBP or both was not significantly associated with conversion to CDMS in our CIS cohort. However, patients with anti-MOG and anti-MBP had higher lesion load and more disseminated lesions in cranial MRI as well as higher values for CSF leucocytes and intrathecal IgG production. Our data support a correlation of anti-MOG and anti-MBP to inflammatory signs in MRI and CSF. The prognostic value of these antibodies for CDMS, however, seems to be less pronounced than previously reported.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the correlation of antimyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-(anti-MOG) and anti-myelin basic protein antibodies (anti-MBP) in serum of CIS patients with inflammatory signs in MRI and in CSF and, as previously suggested,the incidence of more frequent and rapid progression to clinically definite MS (CDMS). METHODS: 133CIS patients were analysed for anti-MOG and anti-MBP (Western blot). Routine CSF and cranial MRI (quantitatively and qualitatively) measures were analyzed. 55 patients had a follow-up of at least 12 months or until conversion to CDMS. RESULTS:Patients with anti-MOG and anti-MBP had an increased intrathecal IgG production and CSF white blood cell count(p = 0.048 and p = 0.036). When anti-MBP alone, or both antibodies were present the cranial MRI showed significantly more T2 lesions (p = 0.007 and p = 0.01,respectively). There was a trend for more lesion dissemination in anti-MBP positive patients (p = 0.076).Conversely, anti-MOG- and/or anti-MBP failed to predict conversion to CDMS in our follow-up group (n = 55). Only in female patients with at least one MRI lesion (n = 34) did the presence of anti-MOG correlate with more frequent (p = 0.028) and more rapid (p = 0.0209) transition to CDMS. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of anti-MOG or anti-MBP or both was not significantly associated with conversion to CDMS in our CIS cohort. However, patients with anti-MOG and anti-MBP had higher lesion load and more disseminated lesions in cranial MRI as well as higher values for CSF leucocytes and intrathecal IgG production. Our data support a correlation of anti-MOG and anti-MBP to inflammatory signs in MRI and CSF. The prognostic value of these antibodies for CDMS, however, seems to be less pronounced than previously reported.
Authors: S Cepok; M Jacobsen; S Schock; B Omer; S Jaekel; I Böddeker; W H Oertel; N Sommer; B Hemmer Journal: Brain Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: M Andersson; J Alvarez-Cermeño; G Bernardi; I Cogato; P Fredman; J Frederiksen; S Fredrikson; P Gallo; L M Grimaldi; M Grønning Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: V Lampasona; D Franciotta; R Furlan; S Zanaboni; R Fazio; E Bonifacio; G Comi; G Martino Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-06-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Oliver W Gramlich; Stephanie C Joachim; Philip F Gottschling; Panagoitis Laspas; Clemens S Cuny; Norbert Pfeiffer; Franz H Grus Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Yuan Zhou; Steve Simpson; Jac C Charlesworth; Ingrid van der Mei; Robyn M Lucas; Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Bruce V Taylor Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Ralf A Linker; Peter Brechlin; Sarah Jesse; Petra Steinacker; D H Lee; Abdul R Asif; Olaf Jahn; Hayrettin Tumani; Ralf Gold; Markus Otto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240