Amado Alejandro Báez1, Peter L Lane, Barbara Sorondo, Ediza M Giráldez. 1. Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. aabaez@partners.org
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The importance of accessing care within the first hour after injury has been a fundamental tenet of trauma system planning for 30 years. However, the scientific basis for this belief either has been missing or largely derived from case series from trauma centers. This study sought to determine the correlation between prehospital times and outcomes among severely injured elderly patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study. All adults (> or = 18 years of age) with acute trauma as defined by The International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes and E-codes were included. Poisonings, single system burns, and late effects of injury were excluded. Chi-square and Student's t-test were used for significance testing. To assess the predictive effects of prehospital time and outcomes, three independent logistic regression models were constructed for both young and elderly groups, with hospital length of stay, mortality, and complications as individual dependent variables. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: Of 41,041 cases, 37,276 were > or = 18 years of age. Of the 1,866 with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, 1,205 were young and 661 elderly. Logistic regression results showed that prehospital time correlated significantly with hospital length of stay (p = 0.001) and complications (p = 0.016), but not with mortality (p = 0.264) among young patients, whereas in the elderly group pre-hospital time had no significant predictive effect for length of stay, complications, or mortality (p = 0.512, p = 0.512, and p = 0.954 respectively). CONCLUSION: This population-based study has demonstrated that prehospital time correlates with length of stay and complications in young patients. In elderly patients, prehospital time failed to show correlation with any outcomes measured.
INTRODUCTION: The importance of accessing care within the first hour after injury has been a fundamental tenet of trauma system planning for 30 years. However, the scientific basis for this belief either has been missing or largely derived from case series from trauma centers. This study sought to determine the correlation between prehospital times and outcomes among severely injured elderly patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study. All adults (> or = 18 years of age) with acute trauma as defined by The International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes and E-codes were included. Poisonings, single system burns, and late effects of injury were excluded. Chi-square and Student's t-test were used for significance testing. To assess the predictive effects of prehospital time and outcomes, three independent logistic regression models were constructed for both young and elderly groups, with hospital length of stay, mortality, and complications as individual dependent variables. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: Of 41,041 cases, 37,276 were > or = 18 years of age. Of the 1,866 with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, 1,205 were young and 661 elderly. Logistic regression results showed that prehospital time correlated significantly with hospital length of stay (p = 0.001) and complications (p = 0.016), but not with mortality (p = 0.264) among young patients, whereas in the elderly group pre-hospital time had no significant predictive effect for length of stay, complications, or mortality (p = 0.512, p = 0.512, and p = 0.954 respectively). CONCLUSION: This population-based study has demonstrated that prehospital time correlates with length of stay and complications in young patients. In elderly patients, prehospital time failed to show correlation with any outcomes measured.
Authors: Joseph P Minei; Robert H Schmicker; Jeffrey D Kerby; Ian G Stiell; Martin A Schreiber; Eileen Bulger; Samuel Tisherman; David B Hoyt; Graham Nichol Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Roger A Band; Rama A Salhi; Daniel N Holena; Elizabeth Powell; Charles C Branas; Brendan G Carr Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Colin R Cooke; Mark E Mikkelsen; Julie Hylton; Tom D Rea; Christopher H Goss; David F Gaieski; Roger A Band Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Michel Debacker; Ives Hubloue; Erwin Dhondt; Gerald Rockenschaub; Anders Rüter; Tudor Codreanu; Kristi L Koenig; Carl Schultz; Kobi Peleg; Pinchas Halpern; Samuel Stratton; Francesco Della Corte; Herman Delooz; Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Davide Colombo; Maaret Castrèn Journal: PLoS Curr Date: 2012-03-23
Authors: Vance Beck; Dan Chateau; Gregory L Bryson; Amarnath Pisipati; Sergio Zanotti; Joseph E Parrillo; Anand Kumar Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Stephan Huber; Moritz Crönlein; Francesca von Matthey; Marc Hanschen; Fritz Seidl; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Rolf Lefering; Stefan Huber-Wagner Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 2.953