Literature DB >> 17334174

A novel framework for reflecting on the functioning of research ethics review panels.

Colin Macduff1, Andrew McKie, Sheelagh Martindale, Anne Marie Rennie, Bernice West, Sylvia Wilcock.   

Abstract

In the past decade structures and processes for the ethical review of UK health care research have undergone rapid change. Although this has focused users' attention on the functioning of review committees, it remains rare to read a substantive view from the inside. This article presents details of processes and findings resulting from a novel structured reflective exercise undertaken by a newly formed research ethics review panel in a university school of nursing and midwifery. By adopting and adapting some of the knowledge to be found in the art and science of malt whisky tasting, a framework for critical reflection is presented and applied. This enables analysis of the main contemporary issues for a review panel that is primarily concerned with research into nursing education and practice. In addition to structuring the panel's own literary narrative, the framework also generates useful visual representation for further reflection. Both the analysis of issues and the framework itself are presented as of potential value to all nurses, health care professionals and educationalists with an interest in ethical review.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334174     DOI: 10.1177/0969733007071361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  1 in total

1.  Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?

Authors:  Edwin R van Teijlingen; Flora Douglas; Nicola Torrance
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.