Literature DB >> 17333013

Neural noise distorts perceived motion: the special case of the freezing illusion and the Pavard and Berthoz effect.

A H Wertheim1, G Reymond.   

Abstract

When a slowly moving pattern is presented on a monitor which itself is moved, the pattern appears to freeze on the screen (Mesland and Wertheim in Vis Res 36(20):3325-3328, 1996) even if we move our head with the monitor, as with a head mounted display (Pavard and Berthoz in Perception 6:529-540, 1977). We present a simple model of these phenomena, which states that the perceived relative velocity between two stimuli (the pattern and the moving monitor) is proportional to the difference between the perceived velocities of these stimuli in space, minus a noise factor. The latter reflects the intrinsic noise in the neural signals that encode retinal image velocities. With noise levels derived from the literature the model fits empirical data well and also predicts strong distortions of visually perceived motion during vestibular stimulation, thus explaining both illusions as resulting from the same mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333013      PMCID: PMC1914253          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0887-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  An acceleration illusion caused by underestimation of stimulus velocity during pursuit eye movements: Aubert-Fleischl revisited.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; P Van Gelder
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perception of visual speed while moving.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Krista Gigone; Rebecca Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A puzzling percept of stimulus stabilization.

Authors:  B S Mesland; A H Wertheim
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Linear acceleration modifies the perceived velocity of a moving visual scene.

Authors:  B Pavard; A Berthoz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: psychophysics of a new phenomenon.

Authors:  T Probst; T Brandt; D Degner
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.

Authors:  H Wallach
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  On the relativity of perceived motion.

Authors:  A H Wertheim
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08

8.  Differential motion hyperacuity under conditions of common image motion.

Authors:  K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement.

Authors:  B J Murphy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Integration of visual and inertial cues in the perception of angular self-motion.

Authors:  K N de Winkel; F Soyka; M Barnett-Cowan; H H Bülthoff; E L Groen; P J Werkhoven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.