Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 [Not Available].

Literature DB >> 17332991

[Not Available].

J G Harms¹, D Jeszenszky.

Abstract

Year: 1998 PMID： 17332991 DOI： 10.1007/s00064-006-0112-7

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol ISSN： 0934-6694 Impact factor: 1.154

× No keyword cloud information.

5 in total

1. Reduction and stabilization of grade IV spondylolisthesis.

Authors: A D Steffee; D J Sitkowski
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1988-02 Impact factor: 4.176

2. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. A surgical solution for failed spinal surgery with a brief review of the first 150 patients.

Authors: J P O'Brien; M H Dawson; C W Heard; G Momberger; G Speck; C R Weatherly
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1986-02 Impact factor: 4.176

3. [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors: R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal: Presse Med Date: 1970-06 Impact factor: 1.228

4. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors: F Denis; G W Armstrong; K Searls; L Matta
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1984-10 Impact factor: 4.176

5. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated.

Authors: R B Cloward
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1985-03 Impact factor: 4.176

5 in total

60 in total

1. Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

Authors: Mourad Ould-Slimane; Thibaut Lenoir; Cyril Dauzac; Ludovic Rillardon; Etienne Hoffmann; Pierre Guigui; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2011-12-17 Impact factor: 3.134

2. Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.

Authors: Yun Liang; Weibin Shi; Chun Jiang; Zixian Chen; Fubing Liu; Zhenzhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.134

3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors: Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 3.134

4. Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.

Authors: Yu-Cheng Yao; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Po-Hsin Chou; Shih-Tien Wang; Ming-Chau Chang
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10. [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].

Authors: F Lattig; E Stettin; S Weckbach
Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 1.154

[Not Available].

1. Reduction and stabilization of grade IV spondylolisthesis.

2. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. A surgical solution for failed spinal surgery with a brief review of the first 150 patients.

3. [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

4. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment.

5. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated.

1. Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

2. Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.

3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

4. Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.

Review 5. [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].

Review 6. [Interbody fusion procedures. Development from a historical perspective].

7. Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.

8. Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction.

9. PLIF in thoracolumbar trauma: technique and radiological results.

Review 10. [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].