Literature DB >> 17332446

How diagnosis-related group 559 will change the US Medicare cost reimbursement ratio for stroke centers.

Bart M Demaerschalk1, Donna L Durocher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke saves societal costs, but hospitals that practice acute stroke care appear to shoulder the burden of the cost, which exceeds reimbursement. With creation of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) 559, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pays hospitals approximately US $6000 more per case when thrombolysis is administered. We sought to determine the total cost of, and reimbursement for, acute stroke treatment with thrombolysis at a single stroke center and the economic impact of DRG 559.
METHODS: Between September 2001 and December 2004, we collected data on all patients with acute stroke who received thrombolysis. We identified all hospital costs and reimbursement per patient. Financial results were expressed as a cost-reimbursement ratio: average total cost to average total reimbursement per patient. We then reanalyzed data using the projected Medicare hospital reimbursement with DRG 559.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with stroke (mean age, 72 years) were treated (mean length of stay, 4.4 days; mean stroke severity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 15; and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate, 7%). The cost-reimbursement ratio was 1.41 (95% CI=0.98 to 2.28) before DRG 559 and estimated to be 0.82 (95% CI=0.66 to 0.97) after DRG 559.
CONCLUSIONS: Our hospital costs have traditionally exceeded Medicare reimbursement for the acute care of thrombolyzed patients with ischemic stroke, but with DRG 559, a new economically favorable cost-reimbursement ratio for hospitals will be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332446     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260185.74694.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  9 in total

1.  Is the Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Thrombolysis Affected by Proportion of Stroke Mimics?

Authors:  Ava L Liberman; Ho-Jun Choi; Dustin D French; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  The impact of hospital-acquired infections on the patient-level reimbursement-cost relationship in a DRG-based hospital payment system.

Authors:  Klaus Kaier; Martin Wolkewitz; Philip Hehn; Nico T Mutters; Thomas Heister
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2019-06-05

3.  Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework?

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Djøra I Soeteman; Ajay Gupta; Hooman Kamel; Alvin I Mushlin; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-07-03

Review 4.  Alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: putting the guidelines into practice.

Authors:  Nandakumar Nagaraja; Harold P Adams
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  A nationwide study on topography and efficacy of the stroke treatment network in the Czech republic.

Authors:  Robert Mikulík; Daniel Václavík; Daniel Sanák; Michal Bar; Pavel Sevcík; Zbynek Kalita; Nils Wahlgren
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Chirag G Patil; Elisa F Long; Maarten G Lansberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Episode-based payment for ischemic stroke care with implications for neurologists.

Authors:  Michael R Dobbs
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-06

8.  Thrombolytic utilization for ischemic stroke in US hospitals with neurology residency program.

Authors:  Yogesh Moradiya; Howard Crystal; Helen Valsamis; Steven R Levine
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke in China.

Authors:  Yuesong Pan; Qidong Chen; Xingquan Zhao; Xiaoling Liao; Chunjuan Wang; Wanliang Du; Gaifen Liu; Liping Liu; Chunxue Wang; Yilong Wang; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.