Literature DB >> 17332265

Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors.

Hendrik Preuss1, Prasanta Ghorai, Anja Kraus, Stefan Dove, Armin Buschauer, Roland Seifert.   

Abstract

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332265     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.120014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  10 in total

1.  Cell adhesion receptor GPR133 couples to Gs protein.

Authors:  Jens Bohnekamp; Torsten Schöneberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The effects of PRX-07034, a novel 5-HT6 antagonist, on cognitive flexibility and working memory in rats.

Authors:  Eric G Mohler; Phillip M Baker; Kimberly S Gannon; Simon S Jones; Sharon Shacham; John A Sweeney; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Interactions of recombinant human histamine H₁R, H₂R, H₃R, and H₄R receptors with 34 antidepressants and antipsychotics.

Authors:  Heidrun Appl; Tobias Holzammer; Stefan Dove; Ekkehard Haen; Andrea Strasser; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Expression and functional properties of canine, rat, and murine histamine H₄ receptors in Sf9 insect cells.

Authors:  David Schnell; Irena Brunskole; Katerina Ladova; Erich H Schneider; Patrick Igel; Stefan Dove; Armin Buschauer; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Lack of specificity shown by P2Y6 receptor antibodies.

Authors:  Weiqun Yu; Warren G Hill
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Flow cytometric analysis with a fluorescently labeled formyl peptide receptor ligand as a new method to study the pharmacological profile of the histamine H2 receptor.

Authors:  Kristin Werner; Solveig Kälble; Sabine Wolter; Erich H Schneider; Armin Buschauer; Detlef Neumann; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  Pharmacological Characterization of Human Histamine Receptors and Histamine Receptor Mutants in the Sf9 Cell Expression System.

Authors:  Erich H Schneider; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Molecular and cellular analysis of human histamine receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Roland Seifert; Andrea Strasser; Erich H Schneider; Detlef Neumann; Stefan Dove; Armin Buschauer
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Gpr126 functions in Schwann cells to control differentiation and myelination via G-protein activation.

Authors:  Amit Mogha; Andrew E Benesh; Chinmoy Patra; Felix B Engel; Torsten Schöneberg; Ines Liebscher; Kelly R Monk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A Dynamic, Split-Luciferase-Based Mini-G Protein Sensor to Functionally Characterize Ligands at All Four Histamine Receptor Subtypes.

Authors:  Carina Höring; Ulla Seibel; Katharina Tropmann; Lukas Grätz; Denise Mönnich; Sebastian Pitzl; Günther Bernhardt; Steffen Pockes; Andrea Strasser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.