Literature DB >> 17332176

Comparison of current health, functional limitations, and health care use of young adults who were born with extremely low birth weight and normal birth weight.

Saroj Saigal1, Barbara Stoskopf, Michael Boyle, Nigel Paneth, Janet Pinelli, David Streiner, John Goddeeris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the current health status, physical ability, functional limitations, and health care use of extremely low birth weight and normal birth weight young adults.
METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted of a population-based cohort of 166 extremely low birth weight survivors (501-1000 g birth weight; 1977-1982 births) and a group of 145 sociodemographically comparable normal birth weight individuals. Current health status, history of illnesses, hospitalizations, use of health resources, and physical self-efficacy were assessed through questionnaires that were administered to the young adults by masked interviewers.
RESULTS: Individuals completed the assessments at a mean age of 23 years. Neurosensory impairments were identified in 27% of extremely low birth weight and 2% of normal birth weight individuals. No differences were reported in the current health status for physical or mental summary scores. Extremely low birth weight young adults reported a higher prevalence of chronic health conditions in the past 6 months. A significantly higher proportion of extremely low birth weight individuals had functional limitations in seeing, hearing, and dexterity and experienced clumsiness and learning difficulties. Except for prescription glasses, medications for depression, and home-care services for extremely low birth weight individuals, there were no significant differences between groups in use of health care resources. Extremely low birth weight individuals had significantly weaker hand grip strength and lower scores for physical self-efficacy, perceived physical ability, and physical self-confidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Extremely low birth weight young adults seem to enjoy similar current health status to their normal birth weight peers. However, they continue to have significantly poorer physical abilities and a higher prevalence of chronic health conditions and functional limitations. Contrary to expectations, they do not pose a significant burden to the health care system at young adulthood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332176     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  35 in total

1.  Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Luca Cicchitti; Alessandra Di Lelio; Gina Barlafante; Vincenzo Cozzolino; Susanna Di Valerio; Paola Fusilli; Giuseppe Lucisano; Cinzia Renzetti; Marco Verzella; Maria Chiara Rossi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  Frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry, salivary cortisol, and internalizing behavior problems in young adults who were born at extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Louis A Schmidt; Vladimir Miskovic; Michael Boyle; Saroj Saigal
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

3.  17-year outcome of preterm infants with diverse neonatal morbidities: Part 1--Impact on physical, neurological, and psychological health status.

Authors:  Mary C Sullivan; Michael E Msall; Robin J Miller
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.260

4.  Aerobic fitness and physical activity levels of children born prematurely following randomization to postnatal dexamethasone.

Authors:  Patricia A Nixon; Lisa K Washburn; Lanay M Mudd; Heather H Webb; T Michael O'Shea
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Visual configural processing in adults born at extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Daphne Maurer; Catherine J Mondloch; Saroj Saigal; Ryan J Van Lieshout; Louis A Schmidt
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-08-27

6.  Birth weight and health and developmental outcomes in US children, 1997-2005.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Laura A Schieve; Coleen A Boyle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

7.  Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; Katri V Typpo; Sylvia J Hysong; LeChauncy D Woodard; Michael A Kallen; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Developmental origins theory from prematurity to adult disease.

Authors:  Mary C Sullivan; Katheleen Hawes; Suzy Barcelos Winchester; Robin J Miller
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Birth weight and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Dodds; H J Denison; G Ntani; R Cooper; C Cooper; A A Sayer; J Baird
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 10.  The developmental origins of sarcopenia.

Authors:  A A Sayer; H Syddall; H Martin; H Patel; D Baylis; C Cooper
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.