Literature DB >> 17330171

Rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices with a wax printer.

Govind V Kaigala1, Sunny Ho, Roel Penterman, Christopher J Backhouse.   

Abstract

We demonstrate a rapid and inexpensive approach for the fabrication of high resolution poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)-based microfluidic devices. The complete process of fabrication could be performed in several hours (or less) without any specialized equipment other than a consumer-grade wax printer. The channels produced by this method are of high enough quality that we are able to demonstrate the sizing and separation of DNA fragments using capillary electrophoresis (CE) with no apparent loss of resolution over that found with glass chips fabricated by conventional photolithographic methods. We believe that this method will greatly improve the accessibility of rapid prototyping methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17330171     DOI: 10.1039/b617764f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  12 in total

1.  Benchtop fabrication of PDMS microstructures by an unconventional photolithographic method.

Authors:  Chang Mo Hwang; Woo Young Sim; Seung Hwan Lee; Amir M Foudeh; Hojae Bae; Sang-Hoon Lee; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Print-to-Pattern Dry Film Photoresist Lithography.

Authors:  Shaun P Garland; Terrence M Murphy; Tingrui Pan
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.881

3.  Rapid and inexpensive fabrication of polymeric microfluidic devices via toner transfer masking.

Authors:  Christopher J Easley; Richard K P Benninger; Jesse H Shaver; W Steven Head; David W Piston
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Comparison of the analytical performance of electrophoresis microchannels fabricated in PDMS, glass, and polyester-toner.

Authors:  Wendell Karlos Tomazelli Coltro; Susan M Lunte; Emanuel Carrilho
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It?

Authors:  Bastien Venzac; Shanliang Deng; Ziad Mahmoud; Aufried Lenferink; Aurélie Costa; Fabrice Bray; Cees Otto; Christian Rolando; Séverine Le Gac
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  From cleanroom to desktop: emerging micro-nanofabrication technology for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Tingrui Pan; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Fully inkjet-printed microfluidics: a solution to low-cost rapid three-dimensional microfluidics fabrication with numerous electrical and sensing applications.

Authors:  Wenjing Su; Benjamin S Cook; Yunnan Fang; Manos M Tentzeris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Milling Positive Master for Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Devices: The Microfabrication and Roughness Issues.

Authors:  Zhizhi Zhou; Dong Chen; Xiang Wang; Jiahuan Jiang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 9.  Print-and-peel fabrication for microfluidics: what's in it for biomedical applications?

Authors:  Marlon S Thomas; Brent Millare; Joseph M Clift; Duoduo Bao; Connie Hong; Valentine I Vullev
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Facile and cost-effective production of microscale PDMS architectures using a combined micromilling-replica moulding (μMi-REM) technique.

Authors:  Dario Carugo; Jeong Yu Lee; Anne Pora; Richard J Browning; Lorenzo Capretto; Claudio Nastruzzi; Eleanor Stride
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.