OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between duration of lactation and changes in maternal metabolic risk factors. METHODS: This 3-year prospective study examined changes in metabolic risk factors among lactating women from preconception to postweaning and among nonlactating women from preconception to postdelivery, in comparison with nongravid women. Of 1,051 (490 black, 561 white) women who attended two consecutive study visits in years 7 (1992-1993) and 10 (1995-1996), 942 were nongravid and 109 had one interim birth. Of parous women, 48 (45%) did not lactate, and 61 (55%) lactated and weaned before year 10. The lactated and weaned women were subdivided by duration of lactation into less than 3 months and 3 months or more. Multiple linear regression models estimated mean 3-year changes in metabolic risk factors adjusted for age, race, parity, education, and behavioral covariates. RESULTS: Both parous women who did not lactate and parous women who lactated and weaned gained more weight (+5.6, +4.4 kg) and waist girth (+5.3, +4.9 cm) than nongravid women over the 3-year interval; P<.001. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+6.7 mg/dL, P<.05) and fasting insulin (+2.6 microunits, P=.06) increased more for parous women who did not lactate than for nongravid and parous women who lactated and weaned. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol decrements for both parous women who did not lactate and parous women who lactated and weaned were 4.0 mg/dL greater than for nongravid women (P<.001). Among parous, lactated and weaned women, lactation for 3 months or longer was associated with a smaller decrement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-1.3 mg/dL versus -7.3 mg/dL for less than 3 months; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Lactation may attenuate unfavorable metabolic risk factor changes that occur with pregnancy, with effects apparent after weaning. As a modifiable behavior, lactation may affect women's future risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between duration of lactation and changes in maternal metabolic risk factors. METHODS: This 3-year prospective study examined changes in metabolic risk factors among lactating women from preconception to postweaning and among nonlactating women from preconception to postdelivery, in comparison with nongravid women. Of 1,051 (490 black, 561 white) women who attended two consecutive study visits in years 7 (1992-1993) and 10 (1995-1996), 942 were nongravid and 109 had one interim birth. Of parous women, 48 (45%) did not lactate, and 61 (55%) lactated and weaned before year 10. The lactated and weaned women were subdivided by duration of lactation into less than 3 months and 3 months or more. Multiple linear regression models estimated mean 3-year changes in metabolic risk factors adjusted for age, race, parity, education, and behavioral covariates. RESULTS: Both parous women who did not lactate and parous women who lactated and weaned gained more weight (+5.6, +4.4 kg) and waist girth (+5.3, +4.9 cm) than nongravid women over the 3-year interval; P<.001. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+6.7 mg/dL, P<.05) and fasting insulin (+2.6 microunits, P=.06) increased more for parous women who did not lactate than for nongravid and parous women who lactated and weaned. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol decrements for both parous women who did not lactate and parous women who lactated and weaned were 4.0 mg/dL greater than for nongravid women (P<.001). Among parous, lactated and weaned women, lactation for 3 months or longer was associated with a smaller decrement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-1.3 mg/dL versus -7.3 mg/dL for less than 3 months; P<.01). CONCLUSION:Lactation may attenuate unfavorable metabolic risk factor changes that occur with pregnancy, with effects apparent after weaning. As a modifiable behavior, lactation may affect women's future risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: R L Hanson; R E Pratley; C Bogardus; K M Narayan; J M Roumain; G Imperatore; A Fagot-Campagna; D J Pettitt; P H Bennett; W C Knowler Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Alison M Stuebe; Ken Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Erica P Gunderson; Janet Rich-Edwards Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Veeral H Ajmera; Norah A Terrault; Lisa B VanWagner; Monika Sarkar; Cora E Lewis; John J Carr; Erica P Gunderson Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Kavitha T Ram; Paul Bobby; Susan M Hailpern; Joan C Lo; Miriam Schocken; Joan Skurnick; Nanette Santoro Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Emily Oken; Rita Patel; Lauren B Guthrie; Konstantin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Natalia Sergeichick; Tom M Palmer; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Helene Kirkegaard; Ellen A Nohr; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Henrik Stovring; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Cora E Lewis; Erica P Gunderson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Erica P Gunderson; Catherine Kim; Charles P Quesenberry; Santica Marcovina; David Walton; Robert A Azevedo; Gary Fox; Cathie Elmasian; Stephen Young; Nora Salvador; Michael Lum; Yvonne Crites; Joan C Lo; Xian Ning; Kathryn G Dewey Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Aaron M Marshall; Laurie A Nommsen-Rivers; Laura L Hernandez; Kathryn G Dewey; Caroline J Chantry; Karen A Gregerson; Nelson D Horseman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Erica P Gunderson; David R Jacobs; Vicky Chiang; Cora E Lewis; Juanran Feng; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 9.461