Literature DB >> 17329517

Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women.

Nita Karnik Lee1, Michael K Cheung, Jacob Y Shin, Amreen Husain, Nelson N Teng, Jonathan S Berek, Daniel S Kapp, Kathryn Osann, John K Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic factors that influence the survival of younger women diagnosed with uterine cancer.
METHODS: Demographic and clinico-pathologic data were collected from the National Cancer Institute database between 1988 and 2001. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Of the 51,471 women diagnosed with uterine cancer in the study period, 2,076 (4.0%) patients were aged 40 years or younger, and 49,395 (96.0%) were older than 40. The mean age in the younger group was 35.6 years, compared with 65.2 years of the older group. The overall distribution by stage was stage I 75.4%, II 8.1%, III 6.7%, and IV 9.8%. Younger patients were more likely to be nonwhite (42.4% versus 18.3%, P<.001) and have stage I disease (79.2% versus 75.3%, P<.001), grade 1 lesions (47.6% versus 35.6%, P<.001), and sarcomas (15.9% versus 8.2%, P<.001) compared with their older counterparts. The overall 5-year disease-specific survival for younger patients was significantly better than that of older women (93.2% versus 86.4%, P<.001). On multivariable analysis, younger age, earlier stage, lower grade, nonblack race, endometrioid histology, and surgical treatment remained as significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival.
CONCLUSION: This large population-based study demonstrates that patients 40 years and younger have an overall survival advantage compared with women older than 40 years, independent of other clinico-pathologic prognosticators. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329517     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255980.88205.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  33 in total

Review 1.  Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marina Šprem Goldštajn; Mislav Mikuš; Filippo Alberto Ferrari; Mariachiara Bosco; Stefano Uccella; Marco Noventa; Peter Török; Sanja Terzic; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Using menopausal hormone therapy after a cancer diagnosis in Ireland.

Authors:  Fionán Donohoe; Yvonne O'Meara; Aidin Roberts; Louise Comerford; Catherine M Kelly; Janice M Walshe; Deirdre Lundy; Martha Hickey; Donal J Brennan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Developing a validated nomogram for predicting ovarian metastasis in endometrial cancer patients: a retrospective research.

Authors:  Peishu Liu; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaodie Liu; Yaohai Wu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Ovarian metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer: risk factors and impact on survival.

Authors:  Tanja Ignatov; Holm Eggemann; Elke Burger; Olaf Ortmann; Serban Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  High-risk endometrial cancer may be benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jin-Wei Miao; Xiao-Hong Deng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 6.  Conservative management of patients with early endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luis Chiva de Agustín; Fernando Lapuente Sastre; Virginia Corraliza Galán; Luis Granados Galainena; Antonio González Martín; Lucía González Cortijo; Natalia Carballo González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Fertility-conservation combined therapy with hysteroscopic resection and oral progesterone for local early stage endometrial carcinoma in young women.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Qisang Guo; Shujun Gao; Feng Xie; Ming Du; Jing Dong; Long Sui; Kangyun Xie
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Himoto; Yulia Lakhman; Shinya Fujii; Satoshi Morita; Jennifer J Mueller; Mario M Leitao; Aki Kido
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-07

9.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Distinct Genomic Landscapes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jungyoon Choi; Andreana N Holowatyj; Mengmeng Du; Zhishan Chen; Wanqing Wen; Nikolaus Schultz; Loren Lipworth; Xingyi Guo
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.