Literature DB >> 17329512

Impact on delivery outcome of ultrasonographic fetal head position prior to induction of labor.

Elisabeth Peregrine1, Patrick O'Brien, Eric Jauniaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical and sonographic fetal head position before induction of labor, position at delivery, and whether occiput posterior (OP) position is associated with adverse delivery outcome.
METHODS: Abdominal palpation and ultrasonographic fetal head and spine position were determined at 36 weeks or more of gestation in 289 women immediately before induction of labor and the head position at delivery noted. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U tests, and logistic regression were used to assess whether OP position was associated with cesarean delivery.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven (36%) of 270 women with full outcome data had an OP position on ultrasonography before induction of labor. Of these 97 women, eight (8%) were OP at delivery. Sixty-eight percent of the 25 OP positions at delivery occurred due to a mal-rotation from a non-OP position during labor. Logistic regression showed that OP position before induction of labor was not an independent predictor of cesarean delivery (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 0.97-3.15, P=.06).
CONCLUSION: Two thirds of OP positions at delivery after induction of labor occur due to a mal-rotation in labor from a non-OP position. Ultrasonography is an easy method of assessing fetal head position before induction of labor. In clinical practice, its usefulness is limited by the fact that, contrary to conventional teaching, OP position before induction of labor does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329512     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255972.48257.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Fetal malposition in labour and health outcomes for women and their newborn infants: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrowclough; Bridget Kool; Caroline Crowther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal spine position.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Alessandra Andrisani; Marco Noventa; Giorgia Burul; Stefania Di Gangi; Omar Anis; Emanuele Ancona; Donato D'Antona; Giovanni Battista Nardelli; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Manipulative Reduction for Abnormal Uterine Inclination in Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Yujuan Yuan; Yadong Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Repeated hands-and-knees positioning during labour: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Robyn Stremler; Stephen H Halpern; Julie Weston; Rory Windrim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.