Literature DB >> 1732933

Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice.

E A Sickles1.   

Abstract

The medical audit is an important component of a comprehensive mammography quality assurance program. It provides a direct assessment of one's ability to detect otherwise occult breast cancer, the ultimate indicator of mammography performance. Audits must be properly planned, executed, interpreted, and used. The audit that shows successful clinical results can be used to build and maintain a high state of morale among mammography personnel as well as to encourage new and repeat referrals to a mammography practice. The audit that uncovers a deficiency in clinical performance can be instrumental in helping to plan remedial measures that correct the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  10 in total

1.  Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Berta Geller; Natalia Vukshich Oster; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Surgical mammography reporting in a limited resource environment.

Authors:  John P Mouton; Justus Apffelstaedt; Karin Baatjes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; S Polk; E Shtatland; J G Elmore; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Sara C Gavenonis; Tina Motazedi; Jessica Cott Chubiz; Elkan P Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Janie M Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Diana L Miglioretti; Lisa M Reisch; Mary B Barton; William Kreuter; Cindy L Christiansen; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Comparison of stereotactic core breast biopsy and open surgical biopsy results at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

Authors:  Imrana Masroor; Shaista Afzal; Gulnaz Shafqat; Yasir Jamil Khattak
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-07-13

9.  Medical auditing of whole-breast screening ultrasonography.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-02-16

10.  CAD May Not be Necessary for Microcalcifications in the Digital era, CAD May Benefit Radiologists for Masses.

Authors:  Stamatia V Destounis; Andrea L Arieno; Renee C Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-07-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.