Literature DB >> 17329197

Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act 2004.

Jean McHale1, Marwan Habiba, Mary Dixon-Woods, Debbie Cavers, David Heney, Kathy Pritchard-Jones.   

Abstract

The obtainment, storage, and use of human tissue taken from children for research purposes is an area that is notable for its complexity and legal uncertainties. In the UK, the controversy surrounding organ retention prompted radical legislative change in the form of the Human Tissue Act 2004, which came into force from September, 2006. This Review paper explores the effect of the Human Tissue Act on consent, in the context of childhood tissue banking. We take as our case study the UK Children's Cancer Study Group tumour bank. Although the Human Tissue Act provides a new, detailed statutory framework, it does not, by itself, resolve all the relevant issues in this area. Researchers and clinicians must, therefore, continue to work alongside the existing principles of common law relating to this issue. Consent for the removal of tumour tissue during a surgical procedure should be distinguished from consent for the retention of the tissue for future use in research or for other specified uses. Consent to surgery is regulated by the same common law procedures used for consent to treatment. By contrast, the requirements for consent to storage and specified uses of samples are predominantly, but not exclusively, regulated by the Human Tissue Act. Although the Human Tissue Act might, at first, seem to promote clarity, the new legislative provisions and resultant Codes of Practice on consent could possibly lead tumour banks to reassess the nature and process of obtaining consent for the use of samples from children in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329197     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70077-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  5 in total

1.  Consent for use of clinical leftover biosample: a survey among Chinese patients and the general public.

Authors:  Yi Ma; HuiLi Dai; LiMin Wang; LiJun Zhu; HanBing Zou; XianMing Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks.

Authors:  Noor Aa Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes Jm van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Ethics and biobanks.

Authors:  M G Hansson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Ethical and technical considerations for the creation of cell lines in the head & neck and tissue harvesting for research and drug development (Part II): ethical aspects of obtaining tissue specimens.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem Jerjes; Panagiotis Kafas; Sandeep U Singh; Jaspal Mahil; Ann Sandison; Colin Hopper; Holger Sudhoff
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-04-03

5.  Enduring Cell Lines: Parents' Experiences of Postmortem Tumor Banking in Childhood Cancer.

Authors:  Nancy J Moules; Catherine M Laing; Wendy Pelletier; Gregory M T Guilcher; Jennifer A Chan
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.