Literature DB >> 17328937

Being "slow to see" is a dynamic visual function consequence of infantile nystagmus syndrome: model predictions and patient data identify stimulus timing as its cause.

Z I Wang1, L F Dell'Osso.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the dynamic properties of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) that affect visual function; i.e., which factors influence latency of the initial reflexive saccade (Ls) and latency to target acquisition (Lt). We used our behavioral ocular motor system (OMS) model to simulate saccadic responses (in the presence of INS) to target jumps at different times within a single INS cycle and at random times during multiple cycles. We then studied the responses of 4 INS subjects with different waveforms to test the model's predictions. Infrared reflection was used for 1 INS subject, high-speed digital video for 3. We recorded and analyzed human responses to large and small target-step stimuli. We evaluated the following factors: stimulus time within the cycle (Tc), normalized Tc (Tc%), initial orbital position (Po), saccade amplitude, initial retinal error (e(i)), and final retinal error (e(f)). The ocular motor simulations were performed in MATLAB Simulink environment and the analysis was performed in MATLAB environment using OMLAB software. Both the OMS model and OMtools software are available from http://http:www.omlab.org. Our data analysis showed that for each subject, Ls was a fixed value that is typically higher than the normal saccadic latency. Although saccadic latency appears somewhat lengthened in INS, the amount is insufficient to cause the "slow-to-see" impression. For Lt, Tc% was the most influential factor for each waveform type. The main refixation strategies employed by INS subjects made use of slow and fast phases and catch-up saccades, or combinations of them. These strategies helped the subjects to foveate effectively after target movement, sometimes at the cost of increased target acquisition time. Foveating or braking saccades intrinsic to the nystagmus waveforms seemed to disrupt the OMS' ability to accurately calculate reflexive saccades' amplitude and refoveate. Our OMS model simulations demonstrated this emergent behavior and predicted the lengthy target acquisition times found in the patient data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17328937     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Effects of augmented tenotomy and reattachment in the infantile nystagmus syndrome.

Authors:  Louis F Dell'Osso; Faruk H Orge; Jonathan B Jacobs
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  The relationship of nystagmus waveform on the VEP response in infantile nystagmus syndrome: a small case series.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Quick phases of infantile nystagmus show the saccadic inhibition effect.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Petroc Sumner; Matt J Dunn; Jonathan T Erichsen; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effects of acetazolamide on infantile nystagmus syndrome waveforms: comparisons to contact lenses and convergence in a well-studied subject.

Authors:  M J Thurtell; L F Dell'osso; R J Leigh; M Matta; J B Jacobs; R L Tomsak
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2010-07-29

6.  Nystagmus Does Not Limit Reading Ability in Albinism.

Authors:  Muriel Dysli; Mathias Abegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Infantile nystagmus: an optometrist's perspective.

Authors:  Asma Aa Zahidi; J Margaret Woodhouse; Jonathan T Erichsen; Matt J Dunn
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2017-09-25

8.  Repeatability and Validity of MNREAD Test in Children With Vision Impairment.

Authors:  Dawn K DeCarlo; Liyan Gao; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Neuromimetic model of saccades for localizing deficits in an atypical eye-movement pathology.

Authors:  Pierre M Daye; Lance M Optican; Emmanuel Roze; Bertrand Gaymard; Pierre Pouget
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  Nystagmus in pediatric patients: interventions and patient-focused perspectives.

Authors:  Kimberly Penix; Mark W Swanson; Dawn K DeCarlo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.