BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Levosimendan is a calcium sensitiser developed for the treatment of congestive heart failure. It increases myocardial contractility, reduces the filling pressure and dilates both the peripheral and coronary vessels. The circulating metabolites of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896, are formed and eliminated slowly after intravenous administration of levosimendan. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of impaired renal function and haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896. STUDY DESIGN: This study was an open-label, nonrandomised, phase I pharmacokinetic study. Levosimendan was administered as a single-dose infusion of 0.1 microg/kg/minute for 24 hours. The follow-up period lasted 3 weeks. STUDY SETTING: Twenty-fivepatients were included:12 patients with severe chronic renal failure (CRF) with creatinine clearance of < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) and 13 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis. A group of 12 healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS: Levosimendan, the parent drug, was eliminated rapidly from the plasma after discontinuation of its infusion, with an elimination half-life (t(1/2)) [mean +/- standard error of mean] of 1.5 +/- 0.09 hours in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis, 1.0 +/- 0.2 hours in patients with severe CRF and 0.91 +/- 0.03 hours in healthy subjects. The t(1/2) of levosimendan was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis than in healthy subjects. The t(1/2) of OR-1855 and OR-1896 were 94.0 +/- 20.4 hours and 96.5 +/- 19.5 hours, respectively, in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis compared with 60.8 +/- 5.2 and 61.6 +/- 5.2 hours, respectively, in healthy subjects (p = not significant). The t(1/2) of OR-1855 was significantly longer (85.0 +/- 13.6 hours) in patients with severe CRF than in healthy subjects (60.8 +/- 5.2 hours, p < 0.05). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of the metabolites were approximately 2-fold in patients with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis and patients with severe CRF compared with healthy subjects. The mean unbound fraction (f(u)) of levosimendan in plasma was approximately 2% in each study group, whereas the f(u) of the metabolites was considerably higher (63-70%). In contrast to levosimendan, the metabolites were dialysable, with dialysis clearance of approximately 100 mL/minute. The haemodynamic responses and adverse event profiles were similar in the study groups, with headache, palpitations and dizziness being the most frequently recorded adverse events. CONCLUSION: The t(1/2) of the levosimendan metabolites was prolonged 1.5-fold and their AUC and C(max) were 2-fold in patients with severe CRF and ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis as compared with healthy subjects. These results suggest that the dose should be reduced when levosimendan is used for the treatment of congestive heart failure in patients with severe renal insufficiency.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Levosimendan is a calcium sensitiser developed for the treatment of congestive heart failure. It increases myocardial contractility, reduces the filling pressure and dilates both the peripheral and coronary vessels. The circulating metabolites of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896, are formed and eliminated slowly after intravenous administration of levosimendan. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of impaired renal function and haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896. STUDY DESIGN: This study was an open-label, nonrandomised, phase I pharmacokinetic study. Levosimendan was administered as a single-dose infusion of 0.1 microg/kg/minute for 24 hours. The follow-up period lasted 3 weeks. STUDY SETTING: Twenty-fivepatients were included:12 patients with severe chronic renal failure (CRF) with creatinine clearance of < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) and 13 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis. A group of 12 healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS:Levosimendan, the parent drug, was eliminated rapidly from the plasma after discontinuation of its infusion, with an elimination half-life (t(1/2)) [mean +/- standard error of mean] of 1.5 +/- 0.09 hours in ESRDpatients undergoing haemodialysis, 1.0 +/- 0.2 hours in patients with severe CRF and 0.91 +/- 0.03 hours in healthy subjects. The t(1/2) of levosimendan was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in ESRDpatients undergoing haemodialysis than in healthy subjects. The t(1/2) of OR-1855 and OR-1896 were 94.0 +/- 20.4 hours and 96.5 +/- 19.5 hours, respectively, in ESRDpatients undergoing haemodialysis compared with 60.8 +/- 5.2 and 61.6 +/- 5.2 hours, respectively, in healthy subjects (p = not significant). The t(1/2) of OR-1855 was significantly longer (85.0 +/- 13.6 hours) in patients with severe CRF than in healthy subjects (60.8 +/- 5.2 hours, p < 0.05). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of the metabolites were approximately 2-fold in patients with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis and patients with severe CRF compared with healthy subjects. The mean unbound fraction (f(u)) of levosimendan in plasma was approximately 2% in each study group, whereas the f(u) of the metabolites was considerably higher (63-70%). In contrast to levosimendan, the metabolites were dialysable, with dialysis clearance of approximately 100 mL/minute. The haemodynamic responses and adverse event profiles were similar in the study groups, with headache, palpitations and dizziness being the most frequently recorded adverse events. CONCLUSION: The t(1/2) of the levosimendan metabolites was prolonged 1.5-fold and their AUC and C(max) were 2-fold in patients with severe CRF and ESRDpatients undergoing haemodialysis as compared with healthy subjects. These results suggest that the dose should be reduced when levosimendan is used for the treatment of congestive heart failure in patients with severe renal insufficiency.
Authors: E Kristof; G Szigeti; Z Papp; A Bodi; A Facsko; L Kovacs; J G Papp; E G Kranias; I Edes Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 1998-09-16 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: P Pollesello; M Ovaska; J Kaivola; C Tilgmann; K Lundström; N Kalkkinen; I Ulmanen; E Nissinen; J Taskinen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1994-11-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A H Karara; R F Frye; P E Hayes; M L Weaver; W T Robinson; R M Rault; G R Matzke Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M A Johnson; G A Verpooten; M J Daniel; R Plumb; J Moss; D Van Caesbroeck; M E De Broe Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Martha C Chapelsky; Kathleen Thompson-Culkin; Ann K Miller; Marshall Sack; Robert Blum; Martin I Freed Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Hannah Kipka; Roland Tomasi; Max Hübner; Uwe Liebchen; Christian Hagl; Klaus T Wanner; Hanna Mannell; Georg Höfner Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 6.525