Literature DB >> 17327363

Does the English Breast Screening Programme's information leaflet improve women's knowledge about mammography screening? A before and after questionnaire survey.

Premila Webster1, Joan Austoker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the English Breast Screening Programme's leaflet improved women's knowledge of breast cancer screening. Design Before and after postal questionnaire survey. Participants A random sample of 100 women aged between 49 and 64 years registered with GPs in Oxfordshire on whom data from a prospective, questionnaire survey was available on knowledge and perception of breast cancer screening.
RESULTS: Women's knowledge of lifetime risk had improved significantly (p < 0.0001) after the leaflet; however, the 'qualitative' interpretation of this numeric risk varied. The proportion of women who said the purpose of screening was to enable simpler treatments had increased from 34 to 45% (p = 0.05). Thirty-two per cent who had previously responded that screening prevented breast cancer now responded correctly; 20% who responded correctly before the leaflet now responded incorrectly. None of the women thought that all screen-detected cancers could be cured; 95% of the women said they were very likely to attend breast screening if invited, and the rest said they were 'fairly likely' to attend. Additional information women wanted included: what causes breast cancer; percentage rates for survival with and without mammograms; and lifestyle advice on how to avoid breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the leaflet had improved women's knowledge of the purpose of screening in some areas, some simple messages in the leaflet had not been understood by all women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327363     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  7 in total

1.  Does educational printed material manage to change compliance with prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Konstantinos Stamatiou; Andreas Skolarikos; Ioannis Heretis; Vaios Papadimitriou; Alevizos Alevizos; Georgios Ilias; Vasilissa Karanasiou; Anargiros Mariolis; Frank Sofras
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Using an informed consent in mammography screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  José M Baena-Cañada; Petra Rosado-Varela; Inmaculada Expósito-Álvarez; Macarena González-Guerrero; Juan Nieto-Vera; Encarnación Benítez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Scarce information about breast cancer screening: An Italian websites analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Concetta Paola Pelullo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Crowd-figure-pictograms improve women's knowledge about mammography screening: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maren Reder; Lau Caspar Thygesen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Migrant workers' occupation and healthcare-seeking preferences for TB-suspicious symptoms and other health problems: a survey among immigrant workers in Songkhla province, southern Thailand.

Authors:  Tinzar Naing; Alan Geater; Petchawan Pungrassami
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2012-10-02

6.  Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gummersbach; Jürgen in der Schmitten; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Karl Wegscheider; Michael Pentzek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Lessons Learned to Promote Lung Cancer Screening and Preempt Worsening Lung Cancer Disparities.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.