| Literature DB >> 17326932 |
Susan M Bernard1, Steven A Anderson.
Abstract
In 2003, US officials identified several human monkeypox cases and traced the virus exposure to infected captive prairie dogs. The virus was likely introduced through a shipment of imported African rodents, which were kept with other mammals, including prairie dogs, in a pet distribution facility in the Midwest. To prevent the further introduction and spread of the virus, federal agencies restricted the importation of African rodents and restricted the domestic trade or movement of prairie dogs and certain other rodents. In this qualitative assessment of the risk for monkeypox associated with the 2003 outbreak, we conclude that the probability of further human infection is low; the risk is further mitigated by rodent import restrictions. Were this zoonotic disease to become established domestically, the public health effects could be substantial.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17326932 PMCID: PMC3291353 DOI: 10.3201/eid1212.060454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Disposition, as of July 11, 2003, of African rodents imported from Ghana to the United States on April 9, 2003*
| Rodents | Dead† | Alive | Lost to follow-up | Total (n = 762) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gambian giant rats | 26 | 20 | 4 | 50 |
| Dormice | ≈350 | 27 | ≈135 | ≈510 |
| Rope squirrels | 49 | 4 | – | 53 |
| Tree squirrels | 24 | 20 | 3 | 47 |
| Striped mice | 14 | 50 | 36 | 100 |
| Porcupines | 2 | – | – | 2 |
*Source (). †Includes animals that died of monkeypox and those that have been euthanized.
Variables considered in characterizing risk for human monkeypox cases and the degree of uncertainty associated with these variables
| Variable | Degree of uncertainty |
|---|---|
| Animal host and carrier species | High—some, but not all, host species identified |
| Proportion of probable host or carrier species infected with virus | High—need to assume absent data that all animals within known or probable carrier species are infected |
| Proportion of animals exposed during US 2003 outbreak infected with virus | High—need to assume that all exposed animals are infected |
| Susceptibility of naive animals to infection | High—but experience in United States and Africa suggests several species and orders can be infected with monkeypox virus |
| Latency in nonhuman species | High |
| Duration of infection or infectiousness in nonhuman species | High |
| Seasonality of disease | High—some indication of peak monkeypox cases in humans in July and August in African outbreaks, which may be associated with human behavior rather than characteristics of virus or host animals |
| Incubation in nonhuman species | High |
| Infection rates in exposed nonhuman species | High |
| Proportion of infected animals (of different species) that shed virus | High |
| Mode(s) of transmission across species and to humans | High—but evidence of mucocutaneous and respiratory transmission pathways |
| Attack rates among humans exposed to infected animals | High |
| Secondary attack rates among humans | High—secondary attack rates seem to be increasing in monkeypox-endemic areas due to increasing susceptibility of exposed populations, and historical data indicating low risk for human transmission may be unreliable |
| Fatality rates in nonhuman species | High |
Qualitative estimation of risk to humans*
| Human exposure to animal | Animal infected | Infection status of animal unknown | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure likely | Exposure unlikely | ||
| Indirect exposure/no direct contact | Low | Low | Low |
| Direct contact, type I* (direct contact without type II exposure) | Medium | Medium | Low |
| Direct contact, type II* (bite, scratch, or contact of animal’s body fluid with mucous membrane or nonintact skin) | High | High | Low |
*Risk was based upon type of exposure to an animal and the infection status of the animal. Type I and type II are arbitrary classifications.