Literature DB >> 17326014

Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force.

Stephen G Weber1, Susan S Huang, Shannon Oriola, W Charles Huskins, Gary A Noskin, Kathleen Harriman, Russell N Olmsted, Marc Bonten, Tammy Lundstrom, Michael W Climo, Mary-Claire Roghmann, Cathryn L Murphy, Tobi B Karchmer.   

Abstract

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating healthcare-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, APIC and SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) SHEA and APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) APIC and SHEA welcome efforts by healthcare consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections. (4) SHEA and APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) APIC and SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17326014     DOI: 10.1086/512261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  34 in total

1.  Predicting clearance of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by use of weekly surveillance cultures.

Authors:  Charmaine M Huckabee; W Charles Huskins; Patrick R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The regulation of infection.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Sensitivities of nasal and rectal swabs for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Andrea Currie; Linda Davis; Ewa Odrobina; Suzanne Waldman; Diane White; Joanne Tomassi; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Hospital infection control strategies for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  B Lynn Johnston; Elizabeth Bryce
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Public health law for the collection and reporting of health care-associated infections.

Authors:  Benjamin Mason Meier; Patricia W Stone; Kristine M Gebbie
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Targeted surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its potential use to guide empiric antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Anthony D Harris; Jon P Furuno; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Jennifer K Johnson; Laurie J Conway; Richard A Venezia; Harold C Standiford; Marin L Schweizer; Joan N Hebden; Anita C Moore; Eli N Perencevich
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  To screen or not to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings.

Authors:  Emily R M Sydnor; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Rapid molecular genotyping and clonal complex assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates by PCR coupled to electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thomas A Hall; Rangarajan Sampath; Lawrence B Blyn; Raymond Ranken; Cristina Ivy; Rachael Melton; Heather Matthews; Neill White; Feng Li; Vanessa Harpin; David J Ecker; Linda K McDougal; Brandi Limbago; Tracy Ross; Donna M Wolk; Vicki Wysocki; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Reduction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among veterans in Atlanta.

Authors:  Edward Stenehjem; Cortney Stafford; David Rimland
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.