OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a phone vs a traditional face-to-face clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss and weight maintenance. DESIGN: Twenty-six week, randomized, controlled trial. SUBJECTS:Twenty-four men and 72 women, ages 25-68 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 33.2+/-3.8. MEASUREMENTS: Weight loss at 12 weeks and weight maintenance at 26 weeks were the primary outcomes. Attendance, meal replacements (MRs), fruits/vegetables (F/V), and physical activity (PA) were measured weekly for process evaluation. RESULTS:Median weight loss (range) from baseline at 12 weeks was significantly different for phone at 10.6 kg (16.6) or 10.4% and clinic at 12.7 kg (19.9) or 13.7%, and both were significantly different when compared with the control group with a weight loss of 0.25 kg (5.6) or 0.24%. Median weight loss at 26 weeks was 12.8 kg (23.4) or 13.0% from baseline for the phone group and 12.5 kg (35.2) or 12.6% from baseline for the clinic group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The median weight loss for both phone and clinic groups at 12 and 26 weeks exceeded the NHLBI guideline of 10% weight loss from baseline. The phone approach may be a viable option to the traditional weight management clinic for both service providers and participants.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a phone vs a traditional face-to-face clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss and weight maintenance. DESIGN: Twenty-six week, randomized, controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four men and 72 women, ages 25-68 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 33.2+/-3.8. MEASUREMENTS: Weight loss at 12 weeks and weight maintenance at 26 weeks were the primary outcomes. Attendance, meal replacements (MRs), fruits/vegetables (F/V), and physical activity (PA) were measured weekly for process evaluation. RESULTS: Median weight loss (range) from baseline at 12 weeks was significantly different for phone at 10.6 kg (16.6) or 10.4% and clinic at 12.7 kg (19.9) or 13.7%, and both were significantly different when compared with the control group with a weight loss of 0.25 kg (5.6) or 0.24%. Median weight loss at 26 weeks was 12.8 kg (23.4) or 13.0% from baseline for the phone group and 12.5 kg (35.2) or 12.6% from baseline for the clinic group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The median weight loss for both phone and clinic groups at 12 and 26 weeks exceeded the NHLBI guideline of 10% weight loss from baseline. The phone approach may be a viable option to the traditional weight management clinic for both service providers and participants.
Authors: Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Melissa Nauta Harris; Damon L Swift; Valerie H Myers; Conrad P Earnest; Neil M Johannsen; Catherine M Champagne; Becky D Parker; Erma Levy; Katherine C Cash; Timothy S Church Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-09
Authors: Robert I Berkowitz; Margaret R Rukstalis; Chanelle T Bishop-Gilyard; Reneé H Moore; Christine A Gehrman; Melissa S Xanthopoulos; William J Cochran; Delroy Louden; Thomas A Wadden Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2013-06-08
Authors: Kimberly A Gudzune; Ruchi S Doshi; Ambereen K Mehta; Zoobia W Chaudhry; David K Jacobs; Rachit M Vakil; Clare J Lee; Sara N Bleich; Jeanne M Clark Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: D K Sullivan; J R Goetz; C A Gibson; M S Mayo; R A Washburn; Y Lee; L T Ptomey; J E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 2.226