L M Lichtenberger1, J J Romero, E J Dial. 1. The Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. lenard.m.lichtenberger@uth.tmc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical studies demonstrate that aspirin consumption reverses the gastrointestinal (GI) benefits of coxibs, by an undefined mechanism. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rodent models were employed to investigate the effects of combinations of celecoxib and aspirin on gastric ulcerogenesis, bleeding, surface hydrophobicity (by contact angle analysis) and ulcer healing. We also evaluated the effects of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin in these rodent models and confirmed its cyclooxygenase (COX)-inhibitory activity by measuring mucosal prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) concentration. We present evidence that aspirin's ability to induce gastric injury and bleeding in rats, was exacerbated in the presence of a coxib and was dependent on its ability to reduce gastric surface hydrophobicity. In contrast, co-administration of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin and celecoxib induced little or no gastric injury/bleeding and maintained the stomach's hydrophobic properties. Interestingly, aspirin and aspirin/PC equally inhibited gastric mucosal PGE(2) concentration. Aspirin in combination with a coxib retarded the healing of experimentally induced gastric ulcers, whereas healing rates of rats treated with celecoxib in combination with aspirin/PC were comparable to controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Aspirin's gastric toxicity in combination with a coxib can be dissociated from its ability to inhibit COX-1 and appears to be dependent, in part, on its ability to attenuate the stomach's surface hydrophobic barrier. This adverse drug interaction between aspirin and coxibs, which impacts the treatment of osteoarthritic and cardiac patients requiring cardiovascular prophylaxis, can be circumvented by the administration of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin, to maintain the stomach's hydrophobic properties.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical studies demonstrate that aspirin consumption reverses the gastrointestinal (GI) benefits of coxibs, by an undefined mechanism. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rodent models were employed to investigate the effects of combinations of celecoxib and aspirin on gastric ulcerogenesis, bleeding, surface hydrophobicity (by contact angle analysis) and ulcer healing. We also evaluated the effects of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin in these rodent models and confirmed its cyclooxygenase (COX)-inhibitory activity by measuring mucosal prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) concentration. We present evidence that aspirin's ability to induce gastric injury and bleeding in rats, was exacerbated in the presence of a coxib and was dependent on its ability to reduce gastric surface hydrophobicity. In contrast, co-administration of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin and celecoxib induced little or no gastric injury/bleeding and maintained the stomach's hydrophobic properties. Interestingly, aspirin and aspirin/PC equally inhibited gastric mucosalPGE(2) concentration. Aspirin in combination with a coxib retarded the healing of experimentally induced gastric ulcers, whereas healing rates of rats treated with celecoxib in combination with aspirin/PC were comparable to controls. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Aspirin's gastric toxicity in combination with a coxib can be dissociated from its ability to inhibit COX-1 and appears to be dependent, in part, on its ability to attenuate the stomach's surface hydrophobic barrier. This adverse drug interaction between aspirin and coxibs, which impacts the treatment of osteoarthritic and cardiac patients requiring cardiovascular prophylaxis, can be circumvented by the administration of phosphatidylcholine (PC)-associated aspirin, to maintain the stomach's hydrophobic properties.
Authors: Stefano Fiorucci; Octavio Menezes de Lima; Andrea Mencarelli; Barbara Palazzetti; Eleonora Distrutti; Webb McKnight; Michael Dicay; Li Ma; Mario Romano; Antonio Morelli; John L Wallace Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Thomas J Schnitzer; Gerd R Burmester; Eduardo Mysler; Marc C Hochberg; Michael Doherty; Elena Ehrsam; Xavier Gitton; Gerhard Krammer; Bernhard Mellein; Patrice Matchaba; Alberto Gimona; Christopher J Hawkey Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 21-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebecca L Darling; Jimmy J Romero; Elizabeth J Dial; Jacqueline K Akunda; Robert Langenbach; Lenard M Lichtenberger Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Marcellus H L P Souza; Octavio Menezes de Lima; Stella R Zamuner; Stefano Fiorucci; John L Wallace Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2003-03-13 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Yan Huang; Lenard M Lichtenberger; Morgan Taylor; Justin N Bottsford-Miller; Monika Haemmerle; Michael J Wagner; Yasmin Lyons; Sunila Pradeep; Wei Hu; Rebecca A Previs; Jean M Hansen; Dexing Fang; Piotr L Dorniak; Justyna Filant; Elizabeth J Dial; Fangrong Shen; Hiroto Hatakeyama; Anil K Sood Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Lenard M Lichtenberger; Dexing Fang; Roger J Bick; Brian J Poindexter; Tri Phan; Angela L Bergeron; Subhashree Pradhan; Elizabeth J Dial; K Vinod Vijayan Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-12-20
Authors: Gert Fricker; Torsten Kromp; Armin Wendel; Alfred Blume; Jürgen Zirkel; Herbert Rebmann; Constanze Setzer; Ralf-Olaf Quinkert; Frank Martin; Christel Müller-Goymann Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Shiyu Wang; Yajuan Ni; Jinchang Liu; Haiyang Yu; Bo Guo; Erwei Liu; Jun He; Xingrui Wang; Yi Zhang; Tao Wang Journal: J Nat Med Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 2.343