Literature DB >> 17325111

Psychiatrists' ascertained treatment needs for mental disorders in a population-based sample.

Erick Messias1, William Eaton, Gerald Nestadt, O Joseph Bienvenu, Jack Samuels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Population-based studies of prevalence have been used to approximate the amount of need for treatment of mental disorders. This study aimed to estimate need for treatment of alcohol dependence, major depression, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and social phobia.
METHODS: Psychiatrists used the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) to assess individuals in a probability sample of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area follow-up study for need for and use of mental health services. Population-based estimates were calculated with probability weights.
RESULTS: The SCAN sample included 816 participants who were interviewed between 1993 and 1999. Prevalence of need for mental health services in the general population was 28.7%+/-2.7%. Among the disorders studied, the greatest need was for treatment of alcohol dependence; 90% of the SCAN sample who met criteria for this diagnosis, or 13.6%+/-1.9% of the population, needed treatment. In the general population, 10.5%+/-2.1% needed treatment for major depression; 5.2%+/-.9%, for social phobia; 5.2%+/-1.6%, for panic disorder; and 3.2%+/-.9%, for agoraphobia. The highest needs for specific treatment modalities were self-help groups for alcohol dependence, talk therapy for depression, behavior modification for social phobia and agoraphobia, and antidepressant medications for panic disorder. Overall, less than 33% of needs were met. Social phobia and alcohol dependence were the two disorders with the highest proportion of unmet need.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of mental disorders is only an approximation of the need for treatment. There is a substantial need for mental health services in the general population. Most individuals who would benefit from treatment are not receiving any type of mental health services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17325111     DOI: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.3.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  6 in total

1.  A clinically useful social anxiety disorder outcome scale.

Authors:  Kristy Dalrymple; Jennifer Martinez; Elizabeth Tepe; Diane Young; Iwona Chelminski; Theresa Morgan; Mark Zimmerman
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.735

2.  Mental Health Literacy for Anxiety Disorders: How perceptions of symptom severity might relate to recognition of psychological distress.

Authors:  Daniel J Paulus; Lauren Page Wadsworth; Sarah A Hayes-Skelton
Journal:  J Public Ment Health       Date:  2015

3.  Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Judith G Proudfoot; Amisha Jayawant; Alexis E Whitton; Gordon Parker; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Jennifer Nicholas
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Anxiety and mood disorder in young males with mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  For-Wey Lung; Chih-Tao Cheng; Wei-To Chang; Bih-Ching Shu
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2008-10-01

5.  The serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (SLC6A4) and risk for psychiatric morbidity and comorbidity in the Baltimore ECA follow-up study.

Authors:  Ruben Miozzo; William W Eaton; O Joseph Bienvenu; Jack Samuels; Gerald Nestadt
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.735

6.  Racial differences in behavioral inpatient diagnosis: examining the mechanisms using the 2004 Florida Inpatient Discharge Data.

Authors:  Yuhua Bao; John Fisher; James Studnicki
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 1.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.