Literature DB >> 17325067

Women Radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology's 2003 Survey.

Rebecca S Lewis1, Mythreyi Bhargavan, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate data from the 2003 American College of Radiology (ACR) survey of diagnostic radiologists with regard to characteristics of women radiologists, their professional activities, and the practices in which they work.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed nonindividually identified data from the ACR's 2003 Survey of Radiologists, a stratified random sample survey that guaranteed respondents confidentiality. A cover letter assured respondents that no individually identifiable information would be disseminated; to further enhance confidentiality, survey operations were conducted by a contractor rather than by the ACR itself. There was a 63% response rate, with a total of 1924 responses. Responses were weighted to make them representative of all radiologists in the United States. Two-tailed z tests of percentages and means and multiple regression analysis were used to compare information for women radiologists with that for men radiologists.
RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of radiologists in training (residents and fellows) and 18% of posttraining, professionally active radiologists were women. Forty-one percent of posttraining, professionally active women were younger than 45 years in comparison with 29% of men (P = .004). Women radiologists were more likely to have fellowship training than men (69% vs 60%, P = .007), although they were less likely than men to have a subspecialty certificate (16% vs 27%, P < .001). Thirty-nine percent of women and 16% of men worked part-time (P < .001). Women were more concentrated in academia (22% vs 14%, P = .009) and breast imaging (27% vs 6%, P < .001) than their male peers but were underrepresented in interventional radiology (2% vs 13%, P < .001) and neuroradiology (3% vs 10%, P < .001). In situations where radiologists are likely to be practice owners, fewer women than men were owners (75% vs 91%) (P = .011). Women reported the same level of enjoyment of radiology as did men.
CONCLUSION: Women radiologists differ from men in regard to age, fellowship training, full- versus part-time employment, academic versus nonacademic practice, subspecialty practice, and practice ownership. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17325067     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2423060282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: why these matter.

Authors:  Johnson B Lightfoote; Julia R Fielding; Curtiland Deville; Richard B Gunderman; Gail N Morgan; Pari V Pandharipande; Andre J Duerinckx; Raymond B Wynn; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomized clinical trial designed to improve interpretation of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Andy Bogart; Edward A Sickles; Robert Smith; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Diana L Miglioretti; Robert Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  The future of mammography: radiology residents' experiences, attitudes, and opinions.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Jacqueline G Snow; Laura Liberman; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The American Society of Neuroradiology: Cultivating a Diverse and Inclusive Culture to Build a Stronger Organization.

Authors:  P M Bunch; L A Loevner; R Bhala; M B Hepp; J A Hirsch; M H Johnson; K L Lyp; E P Quigley; N Salamon; J E Jordan; E S Schwartz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Pregnancy and the working interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Catherine T Vu; Deirdre H Elder
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  'Sleeping with the enemy?' Expectations and reality in imaging children in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Karen S Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

Review 7.  Women in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  M Ines Boechat
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04

8.  Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giulia Fichera; Isolde Martina Busch; Michela Rimondini; Raffaella Motta; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Diversity and inclusion in radiology: a necessity for improving the field.

Authors:  Ritika Manik; Gelareh Sadigh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.