BACKGROUND: Rodents express two isoforms of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor: AT(1A) and AT(1B). It is unclear which receptor subtype mediates contraction in response to angiotensin II in various arteries. We tested the hypothesis that the AT(1B) receptor is the predominant receptor that mediates contraction in the abdominal aorta in response to angiotensin II. METHODS: Isometric tension responses to angiotensin II were determined in abdominal aortic rings obtained from male wild-type and AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. The rings were suspended in an organ bath of a wire myograph and contractions to angiotensin II and other vasoconstrictors were determined. RESULTS: Angiotensin II contracted aortic segments from wild-type mice; however, this response was virtually absent in rings obtained from AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. Contractions in response to K(+) and U46619 (thromboxane A(2) mimetic) were not different between rings obtained from wild-type and AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced angiotensin II contraction is not related to a generalized decrease in smooth muscle function, rather it is specifically due to genetic ablation of the AT(1B) receptor. Our data support the concept that AT(1B) receptors couple to contraction in the mouse abdominal aorta, a function that parallels the single known AT(1) receptor in human vascular smooth muscle.
BACKGROUND: Rodents express two isoforms of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor: AT(1A) and AT(1B). It is unclear which receptor subtype mediates contraction in response to angiotensin II in various arteries. We tested the hypothesis that the AT(1B) receptor is the predominant receptor that mediates contraction in the abdominal aorta in response to angiotensin II. METHODS: Isometric tension responses to angiotensin II were determined in abdominal aortic rings obtained from male wild-type and AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. The rings were suspended in an organ bath of a wire myograph and contractions to angiotensin II and other vasoconstrictors were determined. RESULTS: Angiotensin II contracted aortic segments from wild-type mice; however, this response was virtually absent in rings obtained from AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. Contractions in response to K(+) and U46619 (thromboxane A(2) mimetic) were not different between rings obtained from wild-type and AT(1B) receptor knockout mice. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced angiotensin II contraction is not related to a generalized decrease in smooth muscle function, rather it is specifically due to genetic ablation of the AT(1B) receptor. Our data support the concept that AT(1B) receptors couple to contraction in the mouse abdominal aorta, a function that parallels the single known AT(1) receptor in human vascular smooth muscle.
Authors: Paul Fransen; Cor E Van Hove; Arthur J A Leloup; Dorien M Schrijvers; Guido R Y De Meyer; Gilles W De Keulenaer Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2015-10-03 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Tracy Henriques; Xuan Zhang; Frederique B Yiannikouris; Alan Daugherty; Lisa A Cassis Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: A Phillip Owens; Venkateswaran Subramanian; Jessica J Moorleghen; Zhenheng Guo; Coleen A McNamara; Lisa A Cassis; Alan Daugherty Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Jean Marie Ruddy; Jeffrey A Jones; Robert E Stroud; Rupak Mukherjee; Francis G Spinale; John S Ikonomidis Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jean Marie Ruddy; Jeffrey A Jones; Robert E Stroud; Rupak Mukherjee; Francis G Spinale; John S Ikonomidis Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Ludek Cervenka; Ivana Vanecková; Zuzana Husková; Zdenka Vanourková; Michaela Erbanová; Monika Thumová; Petra Skaroupková; Martin Opocenský; Jan Malý; Vera Certíková Chábová; Vladimír Tesar; Marcela Bürgelová; Ondrej Viklický; Vladimír Teplan; Michal Zelízko; Herbert J Kramer; L Gabriel Navar Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.844