Kirk R Wilhelmus1, Sohela S Hassan. 1. Sid W. Richardson Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. kirkw@bcm.tmc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the discriminatory performance of donor corneoscleral rim cultures for predicting endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. PARTICIPANTS: Studies that reported the prevalence of donor rim cultures after refrigerated preservation of donor corneas distributed for keratoplasty. METHODS: Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. Meta-regression and stratification explored study-level reasons for diagnostic performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis. RESULTS: Of 17,614 corneal grafts, 2459 (14%) had a positive donor rim culture and 31 (0.2%) developed endophthalmitis. Twenty-one had concordant donor and recipient isolates, including 10 with Candida species. The sensitivity of donor rim cultures among 10 studies reporting postsurgical endophthalmitis was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-83%), and specificity averaged 85%. Endophthalmitis occurred 12 (95% CI, 5-29) times more often among recipients of a culture-positive donor cornea. With Bayesian analysis, a culture-positive donor cornea would raise the infection risk to 1%, whereas fungal isolation from the donor rim predicts a 3% probability of fungal endophthalmitis. Pooling of studies was limited by a significant discrepancy among reports that could not be explained by differences in antibiotic supplementation of the preservation medium, method of culture inoculation, or type of culture medium. CONCLUSION: Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty is more likely with a culture-positive donor rim, notably candidal endophthalmitis from fungal contaminants, but better evidence is needed to determine the prognostic value and manner of routine microbiological screening.
PURPOSE: To examine the discriminatory performance of donor corneoscleral rim cultures for predicting endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. PARTICIPANTS: Studies that reported the prevalence of donor rim cultures after refrigerated preservation of donor corneas distributed for keratoplasty. METHODS: Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. Meta-regression and stratification explored study-level reasons for diagnostic performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis. RESULTS: Of 17,614 corneal grafts, 2459 (14%) had a positive donor rim culture and 31 (0.2%) developed endophthalmitis. Twenty-one had concordant donor and recipient isolates, including 10 with Candida species. The sensitivity of donor rim cultures among 10 studies reporting postsurgical endophthalmitis was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-83%), and specificity averaged 85%. Endophthalmitis occurred 12 (95% CI, 5-29) times more often among recipients of a culture-positive donor cornea. With Bayesian analysis, a culture-positive donor cornea would raise the infection risk to 1%, whereas fungal isolation from the donor rim predicts a 3% probability of fungal endophthalmitis. Pooling of studies was limited by a significant discrepancy among reports that could not be explained by differences in antibiotic supplementation of the preservation medium, method of culture inoculation, or type of culture medium. CONCLUSION:Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty is more likely with a culture-positive donor rim, notably candidal endophthalmitis from fungal contaminants, but better evidence is needed to determine the prognostic value and manner of routine microbiological screening.
Authors: Shahzad I Mian; Anthony J Aldave; Elmer Y Tu; Brandon D Ayres; Bennie H Jeng; Marian S Macsai; Michael L Nordlund; Jeffrey G Penta; Sudeep Pramanik; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Wendi Liang; Maureen G Maguire; Jonathan H Lass Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Rawan Saleh Alshabeeb; Ahmed Abdullah Aldayel; Hernan Martinez-Osorio; Muhammad Ali Ahad Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.031