Literature DB >> 17324408

Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope.

Shabana F Pasha1, M Edwyn Harrison, Ananya Das, Carolyn M Corrado, Kristine N Arnell, Jonathan A Leighton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The failure rate of cecal intubation with conventional colonoscopy is 5% to 10%. Double-balloon endoscopy is a new technique for antegrade or retrograde examination of the small intestine, with a flexible scope and a sliding overtube with a balloon at the distal end of both. The entire colon can be shortened and evaluated by the push-and-pull technique, which allows diagnostic and therapeutic interventions (eg, biopsies).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the completion rate of double-balloon endoscopy for colon evaluation (ie, double-balloon colonoscopy) and therapeutic interventions after a prior incomplete colonoscopy by conventional colonoscope.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients (11 women and 5 men; mean age, 69 years) had retrograde double-balloon endoscopy between April 20, 2005, and February 8, 2006, after a prior incomplete colonoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: Completion of colonoscopy with therapeutic interventions, such as polypectomy and hemostasis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Completion rate of double-balloon colonoscopy, therapeutic success of standard procedures, and postprocedure complications.
RESULTS: A completion rate of 88% (14 patients), successful performance of standard therapeutic procedures, and no procedure-related complications. Double-balloon colonoscopy was generally performed with the patient under conscious sedation in a mean (standard deviation) total procedure time (including therapeutics) of 50.6 minutes (SD, 15.2 minutes). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of study.
CONCLUSIONS: Double-balloon colonoscopy has a high rate of effectiveness for completion of colon evaluation in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. It allows diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and can be performed with the patient under conscious sedation within a reasonable time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324408     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  33 in total

1.  Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?

Authors:  Maria Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Rossella Cianci; Alessandra Bizzotto; Cristiano Spada; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Small caliber overtube-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shai Friedland; Roy M Soetikno
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  The difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Todd N Witte; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Small bowel enteroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Gary May
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Fumiko Shigiyama; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided.

Authors:  Arjo J Loeve; Paul Fockens; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  The role of single-balloon colonoscopy for patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy: Is it worth doing it?

Authors:  Michael Christian Sulz; Remus Frei; Gian-Marco Semadeni; Mikael Sawatzki; Jan Borovicka; Christa Meyenberger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single- versus double-balloon-assisted colonoscopy after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jun Uk Lim; Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Impact of an incomplete colonoscopy referral program on recommendations after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Annapoorani Veerappan; Sean T McCarthy; Vineel Kankanala; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.