Literature DB >> 17323819

Results from a multicenter evaluation of the 4th generation Elecsys Troponin T assay.

D Hermsen1, F Apple, L Garcia-Beltràn, A Jaffe, B Karon, E Lewandrowski, A Mühlbacher, R Müller, J Ordóñez, F Pagani, M Panteghini, T Plecko, J Jarausch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Discrepancies between serum and heparin plasma samples have been described for many commercial troponin assays including the cardiac troponin T (cTnT) assay. Using the current 3rd generation Elecsys Troponin T immunoassay, heparin plasma cannot be recommended for the determination of cTnT due to systematic lower test results caused by a direct interference of the immunoassay by heparin. The purpose of the multicenter study was to evaluate the analytical performance of an improved 4th generation Elecsys Troponin T immunoassay with a special focus on the comparability of cTnT results determined in heparin plasma and serum. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The multicenter evaluation was performed in 10 clinical laboratories according to a standardized protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany, Study No. B05P008). The Elecsys Troponin T immunoassay was performed on the Modular Analytics E170 and Elecsys 2010 systems. Intraassay imprecision (n = 21) and total imprecision (2 runs/d, 10 days, triplicate measurements) were evaluated using 2 commercial controls (Roche Diagnostics) and 6 different serum pools (cTnT: 0.0140 - 4.102 microg/L). Intraassay CVs ranged from 0.73 to 3.22%. Total imprecision CVs ranged from 3.61 to 35.45% (cTnT < 0.1 microg/L) and 1.82 to 9.09% (cTnT > 0.1 microg/L), respectively. The cut-off for myocardial necrosis was determined to be 0.03 microg/L using the 10% total imprecision CV criteria. Linearity was assessed by serial dilutions of 6 different serum samples using cTnT negative serum pools. Linearity was proven up to 21.3 microg/L (recoveries: 90% - 110%). Regression data of all comparison studies were calculated according to the method of Passing and Bablok. The method comparison between the 4th generation and the commercially available cTnT immunoassay showed highly similar results across the whole measuring range (0.01 - 25.0 microg/L): y = 1.024x -0.001, r = 0.998; n = 988. Using the commercially available cTnT reagent, the serum to heparin plasma comparison yielded a systematic bias to approximately 8% lower cTnT results in heparin plasma. However, suitable comparability was obtained using the 4th generation Elecsys cTnT assay. The regression analysis (serum vs. heparin plasma) across the studied measuring range (cTnT: 0.01 - 14 microg/L) yielded the following equation: y = 0.975x + 0.001; r = 0.986; n = 403. However, rare individual serum to matched heparin plasma samples still yielded poor comparability (deviation > 20%) using the 4th generation Elecsys Troponin T immunoassay.
CONCLUSION: Our data confirm an excellent analytical performance of the improved troponin T immunoassay. Most importantly, no systematic bias between cTnT results determined in serum and heparin plasma was observed from data obtained in 7 evaluation sites. The performance of the 4th generation Elecsys Troponin T assay is therefore comparable to other commercially available troponin immunoassays. Further studies are necessary to investigate the cause of poor comparability of cTnT results in rare individual serum to matched heparin plasma samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17323819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  12 in total

1.  Discordant cardiac biomarker levels independently predict outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregor Leibundgut; Michael Gick; Olivier Morel; Miroslaw Ferenc; Klaus-Dieter Werner; Thomas Comberg; Rolf-Peter Kienzle; Heinz Joachim Buettner; Franz-Josef Neumann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  High-sensitivity assays for troponin in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Adjustment of the GRACE score by growth differentiation factor 15 enables a more accurate appreciation of risk in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Widera; Michael J Pencina; Allison Meisner; Tibor Kempf; Kerstin Bethmann; Ivonne Marquardt; Hugo A Katus; Evangelos Giannitsis; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Identification of follistatin-like 1 by expression cloning as an activator of the growth differentiation factor 15 gene and a prognostic biomarker in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Widera; Evangelos Giannitsis; Tibor Kempf; Mortimer Korf-Klingebiel; Beate Fiedler; Sarita Sharma; Hugo A Katus; Yasuhide Asaumi; Masayuki Shimano; Kenneth Walsh; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Interference testing.

Authors:  Goce Dimeski
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08

Review 6.  An historical approach to the diagnostic biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Elisa Danese; Martina Montagnana
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

7.  Characteristics of and outcomes for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: differences between females and males.

Authors:  Nguyen Dang Thang; Björn Wilgot Karlson; Thomas Karlsson; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Moderate hyperoxic versus near-physiological oxygen targets during and after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bob Smit; Yvo M Smulders; Monique C de Waard; Christa Boer; Alexander B A Vonk; Dennis Veerhoek; Suzanne Kamminga; Harm-Jan S de Grooth; Juan J García-Vallejo; Rene J P Musters; Armand R J Girbes; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Angelique M E Spoelstra-de Man
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  High-sensitive cardiac troponin T.

Authors:  Ru-Yi Xu; Xiao-Fa Zhu; Ye Yang; Ping Ye
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T compared with standard troponin T testing on emergency department admission: how much does it add in everyday clinical practice?

Authors:  Angelika Hammerer-Lercher; Thomas Ploner; Sabrina Neururer; Peter Schratzberger; Andrea Griesmacher; Otmar Pachinger; Johannes Mair
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.