Literature DB >> 17323429

Comparison of high order aberration after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient.

Chi-xin Du1, Ye Shen, Yang Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To verify whether there exists any difference in higher order aberrations after undergoing myopic LASIK (laser in situ keratomileusis) with conventional ablation and customized ablation in different eyes of the same patient.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study of 54 myopic eyes (27 patients) that underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser system (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). Topography-guided customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) was used in the first eye of the patient (study group) and the other eye of the same patient was operated on with conventional ablation (control group). Higher order aberrations [root-mean-square (RMS) in the 5-mm zone] of both groups were observed with the Nidek OPD-Scan aberrometer before and 3 months after LASIK. Preoperative mean refractive error was similar between two eyes of the same patient (t=-0.577, P>0.05).
RESULTS: Preoperatively, higher order aberrations (RMS in the 5-mm zone) in the CATz ablation and conventional groups were (0.3600+/-0.0341) microm and (0.2680+/-0.1421) microm, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (t=1.292, P>0.05). Three months after LASIK, higher order aberrations (RMS in 5-mm zone) in the CATz ablation and conventional groups were (0.3627+/-0.1510) microm and (0.3991+/-0.1582) microm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between pre- and postoperative higher order aberrations in the CATz group (t=-0.047, P>0.05). However, a statistically significant increase in higher order aberrations was observed after conventional ablation (t=-5.261, P<0.05). A statistically significant difference was noted in the increase of higher order aberrations after LASIK between groups (t=-2.050, P=0.045).
CONCLUSION: LASIK with conventional ablation and topography-guided CATz ablation resulted in the same BSCVA (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) 3 month after LASIK. Higher order aberrations were increased, but the increase of higher order aberrations after customized ablation treatment was less than that after conventional ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17323429      PMCID: PMC1810384          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  14 in total

1.  Factors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  T Baek; K Lee; F Kagaya; A Tomidokoro; S Amano; T Oshika
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing.

Authors:  E Moreno-Barriuso; J M Lloves; S Marcos; R Navarro; L Llorente; S Barbero
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  T Oshika; S D Klyce; R A Applegate; H C Howland; M A El Danasoury
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  B Seitz; F Torres; A Langenbucher; A Behrens; E Suárez
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery.

Authors:  M Mrochen; M Kaemmerer; T Seiler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia.

Authors:  Rudy M M A Nuijts; Vaishaly A Nabar; Willem J Hament; Fred A G J Eggink
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Laser in situ Keratomileusis Corneal Flap Creation With the Nidek MK-2000 and the Carriazo Barraquer Microkeratomes.

Authors:  A Vongthongsri; S Srivannaboon; O Horatanaruang; P Nariptaphan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparison of wavefront-guided customized ablation vs. conventional ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Anun Vongthongsri; Nutharin Phusitphoykai; Pichit Naripthapan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes.

Authors:  M Mrochen; M Kaemmerer; T Seiler
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Wavefront and topography: keratome-induced corneal changes demonstrate that both are needed for custom ablation.

Authors:  Jim Schwiegerling; Robert W Snyder; James H Lee
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Higher-order aberrations and visual acuity after LASEK.

Authors:  Berrak Urgancioglu; Kamil Bilgihan; Sertac Ozturk
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction using the WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser system.

Authors:  Esmeralda Costa; Nuno Franqueira; Andreia M Rosa; Cristina Tavares; Maria J Quadrado; Conceição Lobo; Joaquim N Murta
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Ning-Li Wang; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Visual Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following LASIK on Eyes with Low Myopia and Astigmatism.

Authors:  Smita Agarwal; Erin Thornell; Chris Hodge; Gerard Sutton; Paul Hughes
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2018-05-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.