UNLABELLED: We investigated prevention trends and predictors for osteoporosis prevention in long term corticosteroid users. The use of bisphosphonates increased from 2001 to 2005. Longer duration of corticosteroid use and DMARD use were predictors for receiving prevention. Females appear reasonably well treated; however, men require more attention. INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that long-term corticosteroid users are undertreated for osteoporosis prevention. Our aim was to identify prevention trends in long-term corticosteroid users from 2001-2005 in The Netherlands and to identify predictors for bisphosphonate prophylaxis. METHODS: Pharmacy dispensing data were used from 9 community pharmacies. All oral corticosteroid doses were converted to "prednisolone equivalents". We then identified long-term (> or =90 days) corticosteroid episodes, which required bisphosphonate prophylaxis as per 2002 Dutch guidelines; Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for receiving prevention. RESULTS: We identified 615 different corticosteroid patients requiring prophylaxis. From 2001-2005 the use of bisphosphonates increased from 38% to 54% (p = 0.001). In 2005 females were prescribed more bisphosphonates than males (61% vs. 39%; p = 0.002), or any treatment (72% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of corticosteroid use and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use were independent predictors of bisphosphonate use. Use of respiratory medication was a negative predictor of bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: There has been a significant increase in osteoporosis prophylaxis in a population at high risk for osteoporosis/fractures. In particular, females appear reasonably well treated; however, men are still not receiving prevention to the same degree as women.
UNLABELLED: We investigated prevention trends and predictors for osteoporosis prevention in long term corticosteroid users. The use of bisphosphonates increased from 2001 to 2005. Longer duration of corticosteroid use and DMARD use were predictors for receiving prevention. Females appear reasonably well treated; however, men require more attention. INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that long-term corticosteroid users are undertreated for osteoporosis prevention. Our aim was to identify prevention trends in long-term corticosteroid users from 2001-2005 in The Netherlands and to identify predictors for bisphosphonate prophylaxis. METHODS: Pharmacy dispensing data were used from 9 community pharmacies. All oral corticosteroid doses were converted to "prednisolone equivalents". We then identified long-term (> or =90 days) corticosteroid episodes, which required bisphosphonate prophylaxis as per 2002 Dutch guidelines; Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for receiving prevention. RESULTS: We identified 615 different corticosteroid patients requiring prophylaxis. From 2001-2005 the use of bisphosphonates increased from 38% to 54% (p = 0.001). In 2005 females were prescribed more bisphosphonates than males (61% vs. 39%; p = 0.002), or any treatment (72% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of corticosteroid use and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use were independent predictors of bisphosphonate use. Use of respiratory medication was a negative predictor of bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: There has been a significant increase in osteoporosis prophylaxis in a population at high risk for osteoporosis/fractures. In particular, females appear reasonably well treated; however, men are still not receiving prevention to the same degree as women.
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Andrew O Westfall; Jeroan J Allison; Angela Becker; Linda Casebeer; Allison Freeman; Claire M Spettell; Norman W Weissman; Scott Wilke; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-08
Authors: E D Newman; C K Matzko; T P Olenginski; J L Perruquet; T M Harrington; G Maloney-Saxon; T Culp; G C Wood Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Kenneth G Saag; Stephen H Gehlbach; Jeffrey R Curtis; Thomas E Youket; Karen Worley; Jeffrey L Lange Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-03-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Liron Caplan; Cory B Pittman; Angelique L Zeringue; Jeffrey F Scherrer; Kent R Wehmeier; Francesca E Cunningham; Seth A Eisen; Jay R McDonald Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: C Klop; F de Vries; T Vinks; M J Kooij; T P van Staa; J W J Bijlsma; A C G Egberts; M L Bouvy Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 4.507