Literature DB >> 17323073

Normo or hypobaric hypoxic tests: propositions for the determination of the individual susceptibility to altitude illnesses.

Gustave Savourey1, Jean-Claude Launay, Yves Besnard, Angélique Guinet-Lebreton, Antonia Alonso, Fabien Sauvet, Cyprien Bourrilhon.   

Abstract

Assessment of individual susceptibility to altitude illnesses and more particularly to acute mountain sickness (AMS) by means of tests performed in normobaric hypoxia (NH) or in hypobaric hypoxia (HH) is still debated. Eighteen subjects were submitted to HH and NH tests (PIO2=120 hPa, 30 min) before an expedition. Maximal and mean acute mountain sickness scores (AMSmax and mean) were determined using the self-report Lake Louise questionnaire scored daily. Cardio-ventilatory (f, V(T), PetO2 and PetCO2, HR and finger pulse oxymetry SpO2) were measured at times 5 and 30 min of the tests. Arterial (PaO2, PaCO2, pH, SaO2) and capillary haemoglobin (Hb) measurements were performed at times 30 min. Hypoxic ventilatory (HVR) and cardiac (HCR) responses, peripheral O2 blood content (CpO2) were calculated. A significant time effect is found for DeltaSpO2 (P = 0.04). Lower PaCO2 (P = 0.005), SaO2 (P = 0.07) and higher pH (P = 0.02) are observed in HH compared to NH. AMSmax varied from 3 to12 and AMSmean between 0.6 and 3.5. In NH at 30 min, AMSmax is related to PetO2 (R = 0.61, P = 0.03), CpO2 (R = -0.53, P = 0.02) and in HH to CpO2 (R = -0.57, P = 0.01). In NH, AMSmean is related to Deltaf (R = 0.46, P = 0.05), HCR (R = 0.49, P = 0.04), CpO2 (R = -0.51, P = 0.03) and, in HH at 30 min, to V(T) (R = 0.69, P = 0.01) and a tendency for CpO2 (R = -0.43, P = 0.07). We conclude that HH and NH tests are physiologically different and they must last 30 min. CpO2 is an important variable to predict AMS. For practical considerations, NH test is proposed to quantify AMS individual susceptibility using the formulas: AMSmax = 9.47 + 0.104PetO2(hPa)-0.68CpO2 (%), (R = 0.77, P = 0.001); and AMSmean = 3.91 + 0.059Deltaf + 0.438HCR-0.135CpO2 (R = 0.71, P = 0.017).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17323073     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0417-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.346


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of lean body mass in young boys from skinfold thickness and body weight.

Authors:  T G Lohman; R A Boileau; B H Massey
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Pulmonary gas exchange in acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  J R Sutton; A C Bryan; G W Gray; E S Horton; A S Rebuck; W Woodley; I D Rennie; C S Houston
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1976-10

3.  Are the laboratory and field conditions observations of acute mountain sickness related?

Authors:  G Savourey; A Guinet; Y Besnard; N Garcia; A Hanniquet; J Bittel
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-10

4.  Acute mountain sickness: reproducibility of its severity and duration in an individual.

Authors:  S M Robinson; A B King; V Aoki
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1971-07

5.  Acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  I Singh; P K Khanna; M C Srivastava; M Lal; S B Roy; C S Subramanyam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-01-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Evaluation of the Lake Louise acute mountain sickness scoring system in a hypobaric chamber.

Authors:  G Savourey; A Guinet; Y Besnard; N Garcia; A M Hanniquet; J Bittel
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1995-10

7.  Early fluid retention and severe acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  Jack A Loeppky; Milton V Icenogle; Damon Maes; Katrina Riboni; Helmut Hinghofer-Szalkay; Robert C Roach
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-10-22

8.  Accentuated hypoxemia at high altitude in subjects susceptible to high-altitude pulmonary edema.

Authors:  T M Hyers; C H Scoggin; D H Will; R F Grover; J T Reeves
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1979-01

9.  Acute mountain sickness relates to sea-level partial pressure of oxygen.

Authors:  G Savourey; C Moirant; J Eterradossi; J Bittel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

10.  Hypoxic ventilatory response and acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  J S Milledge; P S Thomas; J M Beeley; J S English
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prediction of the susceptibility to AMS in simulated altitude.

Authors:  Martin Burtscher; Christoph Szubski; Martin Faulhaber
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  The effect of hypohydration severity on the physiological, psychological and renal hormonal responses to hypoxic exercise.

Authors:  Alan Richardson; Peter Watt; Neil Maxwell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of hypobaric hypoxia on heart rate variability during exercise: a pilot field study.

Authors:  Petra Zupet; Tanja Princi; Zarko Finderle
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The human ventilatory response to stress: rate or depth?

Authors:  Michael J Tipton; Abbi Harper; Julian F R Paton; Joseph T Costello
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Association between body water status and acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  Hannes Gatterer; Maria Wille; Martin Faulhaber; Henry Lukaski; Andreas Melmer; Christoph Ebenbichler; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The physiological effects of hypobaric hypoxia versus normobaric hypoxia: a systematic review of crossover trials.

Authors:  Jonny Coppel; Philip Hennis; Edward Gilbert-Kawai; Michael Pw Grocott
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  SpO2 and Heart Rate During a Real Hike at Altitude Are Significantly Different than at Its Simulation in Normobaric Hypoxia.

Authors:  Nikolaus C Netzer; Linda Rausch; Arn H Eliasson; Hannes Gatterer; Matthias Friess; Martin Burtscher; Stephan Pramsohler
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Combined intermittent hypobaric hypoxia and muscle electro-stimulation: a method to increase circulating progenitor cell concentration?

Authors:  Luisa Corral; Casimiro Javierre; Juan Blasi; Ginés Viscor; Antoni Ricart; Josep Lluis Ventura
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Cycling performance decrement is greater in hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxia.

Authors:  Beth A Beidleman; Charles S Fulco; Janet E Staab; Sean P Andrew; Stephen R Muza
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2014-04-28

10.  Same Performance Changes after Live High-Train Low in Normobaric vs. Hypobaric Hypoxia.

Authors:  Jonas J Saugy; Laurent Schmitt; Anna Hauser; Guillaume Constantin; Roberto Cejuela; Raphael Faiss; Jon P Wehrlin; Jérémie Rosset; Neil Robinson; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.