BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a stroke subtype with poor prognosis, but recanalizing therapies have been reported to be effective. We investigated whether initial admission to telemedically linked general hospitals with subsequent stroke-center transfer is related to poorer outcome than direct admission to stroke centers. METHODS: All BAO cases of 3 stroke centers in Munich and 1 center in Regensburg between March 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004 were included, either if patients were directly admitted to stroke centers (n=23) or had initial admission to general hospitals of the telemedical network for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) and secondary transfer to stroke centers (n=16). BAO was defined as angiographically (CTA, MRI or conventional angiography) confirmed occlusion of the basilar artery. Baseline parameters and therapeutic procedures were recorded. One-year follow-up was conducted prospectively. RESULTS: Differences in baseline parameters were not statistically significant. Time from onset to first angiography was significantly longer in patients with secondary transfer (mean: 355+/-93 minutes versus 222+/-198 minutes; P<0.01), mainly attributable to transfer duration (mean:156+/-73 minutes). In-hospital mortality (22% versus 75%; P<0.01) and 1-year-mortality (30% versus 81%; P<0.01) were lower for patients with direct admission to stroke centers. Fifty-two percent of directly admitted patients versus 13% of patients with secondary transfer (P=0.02) were living at home after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: BAO patients who were admitted primarily to community hospitals had a worse prognosis. Patients with typical symptoms should have direct access to stroke centers, or may need bridging therapies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a stroke subtype with poor prognosis, but recanalizing therapies have been reported to be effective. We investigated whether initial admission to telemedically linked general hospitals with subsequent stroke-center transfer is related to poorer outcome than direct admission to stroke centers. METHODS: All BAO cases of 3 stroke centers in Munich and 1 center in Regensburg between March 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004 were included, either if patients were directly admitted to stroke centers (n=23) or had initial admission to general hospitals of the telemedical network for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) and secondary transfer to stroke centers (n=16). BAO was defined as angiographically (CTA, MRI or conventional angiography) confirmed occlusion of the basilar artery. Baseline parameters and therapeutic procedures were recorded. One-year follow-up was conducted prospectively. RESULTS: Differences in baseline parameters were not statistically significant. Time from onset to first angiography was significantly longer in patients with secondary transfer (mean: 355+/-93 minutes versus 222+/-198 minutes; P<0.01), mainly attributable to transfer duration (mean:156+/-73 minutes). In-hospital mortality (22% versus 75%; P<0.01) and 1-year-mortality (30% versus 81%; P<0.01) were lower for patients with direct admission to stroke centers. Fifty-two percent of directly admitted patients versus 13% of patients with secondary transfer (P=0.02) were living at home after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: BAO patients who were admitted primarily to community hospitals had a worse prognosis. Patients with typical symptoms should have direct access to stroke centers, or may need bridging therapies.
Authors: T-H Cho; N Nighoghossian; F Tahon; C Némoz; M Hermier; F Salkine; L Derex; P Trouillas; J-C Froment; F Turjman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lara Connell; Inga Katharina Koerte; Ruediger Paul Laubender; Dominik Morhard; Jennifer Linn; Hans Christoph Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Hartmut Brueckmann; Birgit Ertl-Wagner Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Natalia Pérez de la Ossa; Mónica Millán; Juan F Arenillas; Josep Sánchez-Ojanguren; Ernest Palomeras; Laura Dorado; Cristina Guerrero; Antoni Dávalos Journal: J Neurol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Bart M Demaerschalk; Madeline L Miley; Terri-Ellen J Kiernan; Bentley J Bobrow; Doren A Corday; Kay E Wellik; Maria I Aguilar; Timothy J Ingall; David W Dodick; Karina Brazdys; Tiffany C Koch; Michael P Ward; Phillip C Richemont Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2009 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Erik J R J van der Hoeven; Wouter J Schonewille; Jan Albert Vos; Ale Algra; Heinrich J Audebert; Eivind Berge; Alfonso Ciccone; Mikael Mazighi; Patrik Michel; Keith W Muir; Víctor Obach; Volker Puetz; Cristanne A C Wijman; Andrea Zini; Jaap L Kappelle Journal: Trials Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 2.279