Literature DB >> 17321972

Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.

Soo-Hyun Hwang1, Mark Kayanja, Ryan A Milks, Edward C Benzel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Complications, such as graft subsidence and adjacent segment degeneration, are not uncommon after ventral cervical fusion. It has been theorized, but not proven, that sagittal alignment may affect this process. It is therefore hypothesized that increasing lordosis during anterior cervical fusion decreases adjacent segment motion (ASM) and thus decreases the rate of adjacent disc degeneration. A study was designed to test the first portion of this hypothesis; ie, that increasing lordosis during anterior cervical fusion decreases ASM.
PURPOSE: To determine the effect on the adjacent segment motion (ASM) after ventral cervical spine fusion obtained by varying the angle of lordosis using interbody spacers with different heights (small: 6-mm interbody spacer; large: 9-mm interbody spacer). STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study comparing the segmental motion at adjacent disc levels after cervical fusion with varying angles of lordosis. Sample and outcome measures: six human cadaveric spines C2-C7, range of motion (ROM).
METHODS: Six fresh human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-C7) were embedded at C2 and C7 and biomechanically tested to 0.7 Nm flexion and 0.5 Nm extension. Lordosis was measured at C4-C5 from radiographs; range of motion (ROM) at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6 was measured using markers during flexion and extension in the intact state, after ventral cervical fixation at C4-C5 with a small (6-mm) and with a large (9-mm) interbody spacer. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare lordosis and the ROM for the different states.
RESULTS: Six cervical spines with a mean age of 55.3+/-1.6 years were studied. The mean sagittal angles of the specimens measured at C4-C5 using the Cobb angle method were -6.4+/-1.3 degrees intact, -8.8+/-1.4 degrees with small interbody spacer (intact vs. small spacer p=.02), and -12.4+/-0.9 degrees with large interbody spacer fixation (intact vs. large spacer p=.005). The lordotic angle of the specimens was lowest in the intact state, higher with the small spacer, and highest with the large spacer. The greatest ROM in the intact state testing was at C4-C5 (10.6+/-1.3 degrees), followed by at C5-C6 (7.2+/-1.5 degrees), and then at C3-C4 (7.1+/-0.9 degrees). After C4-C5 fusion, the ROM at C3-C4 and C5-C6 was significantly increased with the small spacer only. No significant change in ROM was observed with the large spacer. The greatest overall ROM (all three motion segments) was observed in the intact state (24.9+/-1.8 degrees), followed by the small spacer (21.4+/-2.0 degrees) and the large spacer (15.1+/-1.7 degrees).
CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, there is a significant increase in ASM with the achievement of a modest increase in lordosis (small spacer) that is not observed with a greater increase in lordosis (large spacer).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321972     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanor M Saavedra-Pozo; Renato A M Deusdara; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Shwu-Fen Wang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Wei-Li Hsu; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The evaluation of cervical spine mobility without significant spondylosis by kMRI.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Akinobu Suzuki; Michael D Daubs; Trevor Scott; Kevin Phan; Jeffrey Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for the Development of Lumbar Spine Adjacent Segment Pathology.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreira Pinto; Artur Teixeria; Richado Frada; Filipa Oliveira; Pedro Atilano; Tânia Veigas; António Miranda
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  The Effect of the PEEK Cage on the Cervical Lordosis in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

Authors:  Salih Gulsen
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-21

7.  Prognostic Value of Lordosis Decrease in Radiographic Adjacent Segment Pathology After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Na Li; Wei Wei; Jing Deng; Yuequn Hu; Bin Ye; Wei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Comparison of two anterior fusion methods in two-level cervical spondylosis myelopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe-Yu Huang; Ai-Min Wu; Qing-Long Li; Tao Lei; Kang-Yi Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The innovative viscoelastic CP ESP cervical disk prosthesis with six degrees of freedom: biomechanical concepts, development program and preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Alain Aaron; Olivier Ricart; Jean Patrick Rakover
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-04

10.  Correlation of Clinical and Radiological Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Polyetheretherketone Cage.

Authors:  Savvas L Spanos; Ioannis D Siasios; Vassilios G Dimopoulos; Konstantinos N Paterakis; Dimos S Mastrogiannis; Theofanis P Giannis; Aggeliki A Fotiadou; John Pollina; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.