Literature DB >> 17321562

The use of direction and distance information in the perception of approach trajectory.

Simon K Rushton1, Philip A Duke.   

Abstract

A pair of projectiles travelling on parallel trajectories produce differing patterns of retinal motion when they originate at different distances. For an observer to recognise that the two trajectories are parallel she must "factor out" the effect of distance on retinal motion. The observer faces a similar problem when physically parallel trajectories originate at different lateral positions; here direction must be "factored out". We report the results of a series of experiments designed to determine if observers can do this. The observers' task was to judge whether the direction of travel of an approaching sphere (test trajectory) was to the left or right of parallel to a previously shown trajectory (reference trajectory). In the first set of experiments the reference and test trajectories started from different lateral positions. In the final experiment they started from different distances. From the pattern of judgements we determined a set of perceptually parallel trajectories. Perceptually parallel trajectories deviated significantly from physically parallel. We conclude that under circumstances comparable to those encountered when catching a ball in flight, observers do not have access to accurate estimates of trajectory direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17321562     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Discriminating direction of motion trajectories from angular speed and background information.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Interaction of cortical networks mediating object motion detection by moving observers.

Authors:  F J Calabro; L M Vaina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision.

Authors:  Andrew E Welchman; Judith M Lam; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of changes in size, speed, and distance on the perception of curved 3-D trajectories.

Authors:  Junjun Zhang; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Spared ability to perceive direction of locomotor heading and scene-relative object movement despite inability to perceive relative motion.

Authors:  Lucia Maria Vaina; Ferdinando Buonanno; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-09-03

6.  Scale Changes Provide an Alternative Cue For the Discrimination of Heading, But Not Object Motion.

Authors:  Finnegan J Calabro; Lucia Maria Vaina
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-27

7.  Detection of 3D curved trajectories: the role of binocular disparity.

Authors:  Russell S Pierce; Zhang Bian; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Functional roles of 10 Hz alpha-band power modulating engagement and disengagement of cortical networks in a complex visual motion task.

Authors:  Kunjan D Rana; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.