Literature DB >> 17321397

Ultrasound biomicroscopy study of the Verisyse aphakic intraocular lens combined with penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.

Jean-Jacques Gicquel1, Sébastien Guigou, Riad A Bejjani, Benoit Briat, Pierre Ellies, Paul Dighiero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior segment modifications after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), previous anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) removal, and Verisyse IOL (AMO) implantation over the iris or under the iris for the treatment of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) using ultrasound biomicroscopy.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
METHODS: A prospective randomized comparative case series included 27 patients (27 eyes) with PBK who had PKP and implantation of a Verisyse VRSA54 aphakic IOL. The IOL was implanted over the iris in 13 patients (Group A) and under the iris in a reversed position in 14 patients (Group B). Ultrasound biomicroscopy scans 6 months after surgery measured central anterior chamber depth (ACD), iris thickness (IT), distance of the haptics from the corneal endothelium (CED), distance of the haptics from the ciliary body (CBD), angle opening distance (AOD) 500 mum from the scleral spur (AOD500) and the iridocorneal angle theta on the 4 o'clock meridian lines (AOD3; AOD9; AOD12; AOD6/theta12, theta6, theta3, theta9).
RESULTS: No significant difference was found in IT, CBD, or AOD12 between Group A and Group B (P >.05). In Group B, the mean ACD was deeper by approximately 55% (P = .008); CED3 was larger by 69% (P = .0162), CED9 by 80% (P = .0128), AOD3 by 57% (P = .0309), AOD9 by 140% (P = .0057), and AOD6 by 44% (P = .0399); and theta3 was wider by 52% (P = .046), theta9 by 123% (P = .0068), theta12 by 50% (P = .0492), and theta6 by 81% (P = .0237).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound biomicroscopy showed that in eyes that had PKP with Verisyse IOL enclavation to the posterior plane of the iris, which involved posterior translation of the iridal plane, the ACD was significantly deeper and the CED and AOD were significantly larger than in eyes with anterior enclavation of the IOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321397     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  17 in total

1.  Visual outcomes and complications following posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Gonnermann; Necip Torun; Matthias K J Klamann; Anna-Karina B Maier; Christoph V Sonnleithner; Antonia M Joussen; Peter W Rieck; Eckart Bertelmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Assessment of the safety and efficacy of primary retropupillary fixation of iris-claw intraocular lenses in children with large lens subluxations.

Authors:  Anju Rastogi; Apurva Goray; Prolima Thacker
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary-Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Satish Gooty Agraharam; Sravanthi Sannapuri; Sunny Manwani; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Iris-claw, retropupillary-fixated, aphakic intraocular lens implantation for traumatic aphakia following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anas A Anbari
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-07

5.  Aphakia correction with retropupillary fixated iris-claw lens (Artisan) - long-term results.

Authors:  Maurice Schallenberg; Dirk Dekowski; Angela Hahn; Thomas Laube; Klaus-Peter Steuhl; Daniel Meller
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-23

6.  Retropupilar positioning of foldable iris-claw intraocular lens for correction of aphakia with no capsular support.

Authors:  Mun Yueh Faria; Nuno Pinto Ferreira; Ivo Gama; Joana Medeiros Pinto; Mario Canastro; Manuel Monteiro Grillo
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2016-10-31

7.  Long Term Clinical and Visual Outcomes of Retrofixated Iris Claw Lenses Implantation in Complicated Cases.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Kirti Relekar
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-04-29

8.  Long-term follow-up of retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Forlini; Wael Soliman; Adriana Bratu; Paolo Rossini; Gian Maria Cavallini; Cesare Forlini
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation.

Authors:  Sezer Helvaci; Selahaddin Demirduzen; Huseyin Oksuz
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation in aphakia for dislocated intraocular lens.

Authors:  Mun Yueh Faria; Nuno Pinto Ferreira; Joana Medeiros Pinto; David Cordeiro Sousa; Ines Leal; Eliana Neto; Carlos Marques-Neves
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2016-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.