Literature DB >> 17321257

Technical feasibility of endoscopic gastric reduction: a pilot study in a porcine model.

Sergey V Kantsevoy1, Bing Hu, Sanjay B Jagannath, Nina V Isakovich, Sydney S C Chung, Peter B Cotton, Christopher J Gostout, Robert H Hawes, Pankaj J Pasricha, Yukio Nakajima, Koichi Kawashima, Anthony N Kalloo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric restrictive procedures are widely used for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the technical feasibility of endoscopic gastric reduction in a live porcine model.
SETTING: Acute experiments on 50-kg pigs under general anesthesia. DESIGN AND
INTERVENTIONS: After per-oral intubation, the endoscope was inserted into the stomach. A fishing line was sutured to the gastric wall along the fundus approximately 5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction with a prototype endoscopic suturing device (Olympus, Eagle Claw). Then the fishing line was tied to create a small proximal pouch. A flexible sheath was placed on one side of fishing line and additional knots were tied, forming a ring at the outlet of the gastric pouch. The ring was anchored to gastric wall with additional stitches, completing the gastric reduction. Then the animals were killed for postmortem examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The feasibility of endoscopic gastric reduction.
RESULTS: We performed 4 acute experiments. It required 12 to 14 stitches in each animal to create gastric reduction. There were no technical problems during the procedures. Postmortem examination demonstrated an approximately 30-mL gastric pouch separated from the rest of the stomach by the line of stitches. There were no complications during the procedure. LIMITATIONS: We have not performed survival experiments to determine how long our gastric reduction will last.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic gastric reduction is technically feasible on a live porcine model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321257     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

Review 1.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Transesophageal/transgastric access for NOTES].

Authors:  A Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Video. "No scar" small bowel resection in a survival porcine model using transcolonic NOTES(®) and transabdominal approach.

Authors:  Elena Dubcenco; Teodor Grantcharov; Frank C S Eng; Catherine J Streutker; Nancy N Baxter; Ori D Rotstein; Jeffrey P Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Malik; J D Mellinger; J W Hazey; B J Dunkin; B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Assessment of a simple, novel endoluminal method for gastrotomy closure in NOTES.

Authors:  Sang Soo Lee; Brant K Oelschlager; Andrew S Wright; Renato V Soares; Huseyin Sinan; Martin I Montenovo; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Safety, feasibility and weight loss after transoral gastroplasty: First human multicenter study.

Authors:  J Devière; G Ojeda Valdes; L Cuevas Herrera; J Closset; O Le Moine; P Eisendrath; C Moreno; S Dugardeyn; M Barea; R de la Torre; S Edmundowicz; S Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.