Literature DB >> 17321256

Endoluminal clip closure of a circular full-thickness colon resection in a porcine model (with videos).

Gottumukkala S Raju1, Ijaz Ahmed, Goro Shibukawa, Allison Poussard, Douglas Brining.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Linear perforations of the colon can be closed by the application of clips through a colonoscope. It is unclear whether circular perforations after full-thickness resection of the colon can be closed with clips.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an animal model for circular perforation of the colon and to study different techniques to accomplish a leakproof sealing of the circular perforation of the colon.
DESIGN: Pilot study.
SETTING: University medical center. ANIMALS: Ten pigs: 2 perforations in the 1st pig and 1 perforation in the 2nd to 9th pigs were closed with clips. In the 10th pig, 5 perforations were created, and the dimensions of the perforation were measured.
INTERVENTIONS: Creation of a circular full-thickness resection of the colon with a band-ligation-resection device, followed by longitudinal or transverse endoluminal closure of the perforation by using the first clip opened and applied in the 3- to 9-o'clock or the 6- to 12-o'clock direction in relation to the circular perforation, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The mean (standard deviation) size of circular perforation was 1.7 +/- 0.075 cm (range, 1.5-2.0 cm). Necropsy immediately after closure of the perforation was done to examine the closure and to confirm the quality of sealing with the methylene blue dye leak test.
RESULTS: The transverse closure was unsuccessful in the closure of 3 perforations, whereas the longitudinal closure resulted in a leakproof sealing in 6 of the 7 closures. LIMITATIONS: Perforation of the adjacent viscera limits it to a nonsurvival study.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal application of clips by using the longitudinal closure technique results in a leak proof sealing of circular perforations of the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321256     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status.

Authors:  Arthur Schmidt; Benjamin Meier; Karel Caca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Preventing physician quality of life from impinging on patient quality of care: weakening the weekend effect.

Authors:  Marc D Basson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Khalid N Alsowaina; Mooyad A Ahmed; Nawar A Alkhamesi; Ahmad I Elnahas; Jeffrey D Hawel; Nitin V Khanna; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Reliable gastric closure after natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using a novel automated flexible stapling device.

Authors:  O R Meireles; S V Kantsevoy; L R Assumpcao; P Magno; X Dray; S A Giday; A N Kalloo; E J Hanly; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Current endoscopic closure techniques for the management of gastrointestinal perforations.

Authors:  Dominic Staudenmann; Kevin Kyung Ho Choi; Arthur John Kaffes; Payal Saxena
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-02-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.