OBJECTIVES: Currently three tests are approved for the estimation of neutralizing antibodies after rabies vaccination: the mouse neutralization test (MNT), the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test. Performance of these tests requires a lot of expertise and is generally carried out in reference laboratories and, hence, they are not available to many people. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA) for estimation of neutralizing antibodies in order to make this testing more widely available. METHODS: The C-ELISA was designed based on competition between a murine neutralizing monoclonal antibody (Mab) and the antibodies in serum of vaccinated people. The test was initially standardized using known negative and known positive serum samples for determining the optimal dilution of the Mab as well as the cut-off value (%) for ascertaining the level of inhibition. Nine hundred and ninety serum samples were tested from 250 people who had been administered purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV). Serum samples were collected on days 0, 14, 30 and 90 post-vaccination, and were tested by C-ELISA. RESULTS: All the serum samples that were positive by RFFIT were also positive by C-ELISA. The titers obtained with C-ELISA were marginally higher than the RFFIT titers, but a significant correlation was noted between the two tests (r=0.897). None of the negative controls were detected to be positive for rabies antibodies by either of these tests. Therefore the C-ELISA was found to be 100% specific and sensitive in comparison to RFFIT. Further, the initial rise and fall of antibody titers on different days post-vaccination was comparable for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: The C-ELISA described herein can be used to quantify rabies neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination. This test is simple and can be conveniently used under field conditions for monitoring seroconversion after post-exposure rabies vaccination. Moreover it does not require handling of infectious virus by the end user.
OBJECTIVES: Currently three tests are approved for the estimation of neutralizing antibodies after rabies vaccination: the mouse neutralization test (MNT), the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test. Performance of these tests requires a lot of expertise and is generally carried out in reference laboratories and, hence, they are not available to many people. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA) for estimation of neutralizing antibodies in order to make this testing more widely available. METHODS: The C-ELISA was designed based on competition between a murine neutralizing monoclonal antibody (Mab) and the antibodies in serum of vaccinated people. The test was initially standardized using known negative and known positive serum samples for determining the optimal dilution of the Mab as well as the cut-off value (%) for ascertaining the level of inhibition. Nine hundred and ninety serum samples were tested from 250 people who had been administered purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV). Serum samples were collected on days 0, 14, 30 and 90 post-vaccination, and were tested by C-ELISA. RESULTS: All the serum samples that were positive by RFFIT were also positive by C-ELISA. The titers obtained with C-ELISA were marginally higher than the RFFIT titers, but a significant correlation was noted between the two tests (r=0.897). None of the negative controls were detected to be positive for rabies antibodies by either of these tests. Therefore the C-ELISA was found to be 100% specific and sensitive in comparison to RFFIT. Further, the initial rise and fall of antibody titers on different days post-vaccination was comparable for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: The C-ELISA described herein can be used to quantify rabies neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination. This test is simple and can be conveniently used under field conditions for monitoring seroconversion after post-exposure rabies vaccination. Moreover it does not require handling of infectious virus by the end user.
Authors: Susan Realegeno; Michael Niezgoda; Pamela A Yager; Amrita Kumar; Laboni Hoque; Lillian Orciari; Suryaprakash Sambhara; Victoria A Olson; Panayampalli Subbian Satheshkumar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ashis Debnath; Dinesh C Pathak; Narayan Ramamurthy; Gulam Mohd; A B Pandey; Vikramaditya Upmanyu; A K Tiwari; R Saravanan; Madhan Mohan Chellappa; Sohini Dey Journal: Vet World Date: 2019-01-23