INTRODUCTION: Thoracic outlet syndromes are expressed by various clinical manifestations. Treatment is mainly rehabilitation. We aimed to identify factors predicting long-term functional rehabilitation in patients with this treatment and recurrence of symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective analysis of 84 patients who underwent rehabilitation for thoracic outlet syndrome as defined by Revel and colleagues. Data collection involved a questionnaire exploring personal information, risk factors for developing thoracic outlet syndrome, clinical signs, and x-ray results. Long-term results of treatment were evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Data analysis involved use of Stata 6 software. RESULTS: Univariate analysis: predictive factors of negative results with treatment were ligament hypermobility, sensitive disturbances at the time of diagnosis, and a positive Adson's test result. Predictive factors of positive results were absence of paresthesia at the end of the treatment, and a negative "bell sign" at the end of the treatment. Predictive factors of nonrecurring symptoms were age younger than 34, bilateral positive Adson test result, and need for a supplementary number of sessions. MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS: predictive factors of positive results with treatment were absence of sensitive impairment at the time of diagnosis, compliance with home exercises, initial negative Adson's test result, absence of hypermobility, and absence of paresthesia at the end of treatment. Predictive factors of recurring symptoms were age younger than 34, the need for a supplementary number of sessions and bilateral positive Adson's test result. CONCLUSION: A larger number of subjects are needed to further explore the predictive factors of rehabilitation and recurring symptoms in thoracic outlet syndrome for better validity and significance.
INTRODUCTION: Thoracic outlet syndromes are expressed by various clinical manifestations. Treatment is mainly rehabilitation. We aimed to identify factors predicting long-term functional rehabilitation in patients with this treatment and recurrence of symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective analysis of 84 patients who underwent rehabilitation for thoracic outlet syndrome as defined by Revel and colleagues. Data collection involved a questionnaire exploring personal information, risk factors for developing thoracic outlet syndrome, clinical signs, and x-ray results. Long-term results of treatment were evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Data analysis involved use of Stata 6 software. RESULTS: Univariate analysis: predictive factors of negative results with treatment were ligament hypermobility, sensitive disturbances at the time of diagnosis, and a positive Adson's test result. Predictive factors of positive results were absence of paresthesia at the end of the treatment, and a negative "bell sign" at the end of the treatment. Predictive factors of nonrecurring symptoms were age younger than 34, bilateral positive Adson test result, and need for a supplementary number of sessions. MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS: predictive factors of positive results with treatment were absence of sensitive impairment at the time of diagnosis, compliance with home exercises, initial negative Adson's test result, absence of hypermobility, and absence of paresthesia at the end of treatment. Predictive factors of recurring symptoms were age younger than 34, the need for a supplementary number of sessions and bilateral positive Adson's test result. CONCLUSION: A larger number of subjects are needed to further explore the predictive factors of rehabilitation and recurring symptoms in thoracic outlet syndrome for better validity and significance.
Authors: Alban Fouasson-Chailloux; Pierre Menu; Pauline Daley; Giovanni Gautier; Guillaume Gadbled; Pierre Abraham; Marc Dauty Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-01-15