BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity is a serious manifestation of anticonvulsant therapy characterized by infiltration of the epidermis and dermis by activated CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cells, respectively. Attempts to characterize drug-specific CD8(+) T cells have been largely unsuccessful. OBJECTIVES: The aim of these studies was to generate and characterize CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells in patients with carbamazepine hypersensitivity. METHODS: Carbamazepine-specific T-cell clones were generated from 5 patients by using modified cloning methodologies. Cell surface receptor phenotype, functionality, and mechanisms of antigen presentation were then compared. RESULTS: Ninety CD4(+), 23 CD8(+), and 14 CD4(+)CD8(+) carbamazepine-specific T-cell clones were generated. CD4(+) T-cell clones proliferated vigorously with carbamazepine associated with MHC class II but exhibited little cytotoxic activity. In contrast, most CD8(+) T cells proliferated weakly but effectively killed target cells via an MHC class I or MHC class II restricted, perforin-dependent pathway. CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells displayed characteristics similar to those of CD4(+) T cells; however, drug stimulation was demonstrable in the absence of antigen-presenting cells. Carbamazepine was presented to CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells in the absence of antigen processing. Drug stimulation resulted in the secretion of IFN-gamma and IL-5. A panel of CD11a(+)CD27(-) clones differentially expressed the receptors CXCR4, CCR4, CCR5, CCR8, CCR9, and CCR10. CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine-specific CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells exist in the peripheral circulation of hypersensitive patients, often many years after the resolution of clinical manifestations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Carbamazepine-specific CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells displaying different effector functions and homing characteristics persist in hypersensitive patients' blood for many years after resolution of clinical symptoms.
BACKGROUND:Hypersensitivity is a serious manifestation of anticonvulsant therapy characterized by infiltration of the epidermis and dermis by activated CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cells, respectively. Attempts to characterize drug-specific CD8(+) T cells have been largely unsuccessful. OBJECTIVES: The aim of these studies was to generate and characterize CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells in patients with carbamazepinehypersensitivity. METHODS:Carbamazepine-specific T-cell clones were generated from 5 patients by using modified cloning methodologies. Cell surface receptor phenotype, functionality, and mechanisms of antigen presentation were then compared. RESULTS: Ninety CD4(+), 23 CD8(+), and 14 CD4(+)CD8(+) carbamazepine-specific T-cell clones were generated. CD4(+) T-cell clones proliferated vigorously with carbamazepine associated with MHC class II but exhibited little cytotoxic activity. In contrast, most CD8(+) T cells proliferated weakly but effectively killed target cells via an MHC class I or MHC class II restricted, perforin-dependent pathway. CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells displayed characteristics similar to those of CD4(+) T cells; however, drug stimulation was demonstrable in the absence of antigen-presenting cells. Carbamazepine was presented to CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells in the absence of antigen processing. Drug stimulation resulted in the secretion of IFN-gamma and IL-5. A panel of CD11a(+)CD27(-) clones differentially expressed the receptors CXCR4, CCR4, CCR5, CCR8, CCR9, and CCR10. CONCLUSION:Carbamazepine-specific CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells exist in the peripheral circulation of hypersensitivepatients, often many years after the resolution of clinical manifestations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Carbamazepine-specific CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells displaying different effector functions and homing characteristics persist in hypersensitivepatients' blood for many years after resolution of clinical symptoms.
Authors: Mark McCormack; Ana Alfirevic; Stephane Bourgeois; John J Farrell; Dalia Kasperavičiūtė; Mary Carrington; Graeme J Sills; Tony Marson; Xiaoming Jia; Paul I W de Bakker; Krishna Chinthapalli; Mariam Molokhia; Michael R Johnson; Gerard D O'Connor; Elijah Chaila; Saud Alhusaini; Kevin V Shianna; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; Nicole Walley; Massimo Pandolfo; Werner Pichler; B Kevin Park; Chantal Depondt; Sanjay M Sisodiya; David B Goldstein; Panos Deloukas; Norman Delanty; Gianpiero L Cavalleri; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sabah El-Ghaiesh; Manal M Monshi; Paul Whitaker; Rosalind Jenkins; Xiaoli Meng; John Farrell; Ayman Elsheikh; Daniel Peckham; Neil French; Munir Pirmohamed; B Kevin Park; Dean J Naisbitt Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Ayman Elsheikh; Sidonie N Lavergne; J Luis Castrejon; John Farrell; Haiyi Wang; Jean Sathish; Werner J Pichler; B Kevin Park; Dean J Naisbitt Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Abdelbaset A Elzagallaai; Sandra R Knowles; Michael J Rieder; John R Bend; Neil H Shear; Gideon Koren Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: H Y Lee; M X Shen; Y L Lim; Y K Tay; M M F Chan; S M Pang; Z W Xiao; S B Ang; E C Ren Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Paul Whitaker; Xiaoli Meng; Sidonie N Lavergne; Sabah El-Ghaiesh; Manal Monshi; Caroline Earnshaw; Daniel Peckham; Jimmy Gooi; Steve Conway; Munir Pirmohamed; Rosalind E Jenkins; Dean J Naisbitt; B Kevin Park Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 5.422