Literature DB >> 17320730

Magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of clinical outcome in patients with sciatica receiving active conservative treatment.

Tue Secher Jensen1, Hanne B Albert, Joan S Sorensen, Claus Manniche, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the possible prognostic value of disk-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in relation to recovery at 14 months in patients with severe sciatica, and whether improvement of disk herniation and/or nerve root compromise is concurrent with recovery.
METHODS: All patients included in this prospective observational study of patients with sciatica receiving active conservative treatment were scanned at baseline and at 14 months' follow-up. Definite recovery at follow-up was defined as an absence of sciatic leg pain and a Roland Morris disability score of 3 or less. Potential predictors of interest were disk-related MRI findings in the lumbar spine. Bi- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify any predictors of recovery. Age, sex, and treatment were included in the analyses as possible confounding/modifying factors.
RESULTS: According to the definitions used, 53% of 154 patients recovered; 63% of men (n = 84) and 40% of women (n = 70). In the multivariate analyses, broad-based protrusions, extrusions, and male sex were found to be predictive of a positive outcome. Sex was identified as a true confounder in that the prevalence of disk-related MRI findings was different for men and women, and they had different recovery rates. Improvement of disk herniations and nerve root compromise over time did not coincide with definite recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sciatica receiving active conservative treatment, broad-based protrusions and extrusions at baseline were positive predictors of definite recovery at 14 months. However, at 14 months the MRI-defined improvement of disk herniations and nerve root compromise was not correlated with definite recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17320730     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  16 in total

Review 1.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with electrodiagnostic findings in the evaluation of clinical radiculopathy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zahra Reza Soltani; Simin Sajadi; Behrooz Tavana
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The added prognostic value of MRI findings for recovery in patients with low back pain in primary care: a 1-year follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Evelien I T de Schepper; Bart W Koes; Edwin H G Oei; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Pim A J Luijsterburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  How little pain and disability do patients with low back pain have to experience to feel that they have recovered?

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Mark J Hancock; Julia M Hush; Robert J Smeets
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Eva Brosjö; Hans Billing; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Target Value to Distinguish between Functional and Dysfunctional States in People with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy: what factors predict treatment failure?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; M Jake Carlson; James Rainville
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prognostic factors for non-success in patients with sciatica and disc herniation.

Authors:  Anne Julsrud Haugen; Jens Ivar Brox; Lars Grøvle; Anne Keller; Bård Natvig; Dag Soldal; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Estimates of success in patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation depend upon outcome measure.

Authors:  Anne Julsrud Haugen; Lars Grøvle; Jens Ivar Brox; Bård Natvig; Anne Keller; Dag Soldal; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.