Literature DB >> 17320662

Lack of progress in early diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Motoo Araki1, Alan M Nieder, Murugesan Manoharan, Yulong Yang, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The stage of presentation of prostate cancer has changed dramatically in the past two decades, largely because of prostate-specific antigen screening and increased public awareness regarding the disease. Recently, strides have been made in the validation, development, and approval of bladder cancer (BC) markers. We sought to evaluate whether any stage migration has occurred for patients with BC during the same period.
METHODS: A total of 351 and 1262 patients underwent radical cystectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy, respectively, between 1992 and 2005 by one surgeon. The patients were divided into two consecutive groups: group 1 (1992 to 1998) and group 2 (1999 to 2005). The baseline and pathologic characteristics of the patients were compared.
RESULTS: No differences were found in the clinical or pathologic staging between the two groups of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival also was not different between the two groups. For patients with prostate cancer, those in group 2 presented at a younger age, with a lower prostate-specific antigen level, and had a lower clinical stage. Group 2 patients had a decrease in the incidence of extracapsular extension, a decreased tumor volume, and a decrease in the incidence of Gleason 8 to 10 tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: During two consecutive periods, our patients with prostate cancer presented with the cancer at an earlier stage and had more favorable pathologic features after radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, our patients with BC did not demonstrate any stage migration. Physicians need to be more aggressive in diagnosing BC, especially in patients at high risk of the disease. Risk factors must be emphasized, urine markers should be used in a screening strategy, and the indications for radical cystectomy should be liberalized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17320662     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for development of diagnostic markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Goebell; Susan L Groshen; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Modulated Raman Spectroscopy for Enhanced Cancer Diagnosis at the Cellular Level.

Authors:  Anna Chiara De Luca; Kishan Dholakia; Michael Mazilu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  A prognosis marker MUC1 correlates with metabolism and drug resistance in bladder cancer: a bioinformatics research.

Authors:  Liangliang Qing; Qingchao Li; Yongjin Yang; Wenbo Xu; Zhilong Dong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.