Literature DB >> 17320231

Effect of various chemical decontamination treatments on natural microflora and sensory characteristics of poultry.

Elena del Río1, Mónica Panizo-Morán, Miguel Prieto, Carlos Alonso-Calleja, Rosa Capita.   

Abstract

Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council provides a legal basis permitting the use of antimicrobial treatments to remove surface contamination from poultry. This paper reports the results of research into the effects on natural microflora, pH, and sensorial characteristics achieved by dipping chicken legs (15 min, 18+/-1 degrees C) into solutions (wt/vol) of 12% trisodium phosphate (TSP), 1200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite (ASC), 2% citric acid (CA), 220 ppm peroxyacids (Inspexx 100; PA), and water. Samples were collected immediately after evisceration, subjected to the treatments listed or left untreated (control) and tested after 0, 1, 3 and 5 days of storage (3 degrees C+/-1 degrees C). For most microbial groups similar counts were observed on water-dipped and on untreated legs. All the chemical compounds were effective in reducing microbial populations throughout storage, with TSP, ASC and CA showing the strongest antimicrobial activity. The average reductions (mean+/-standard deviation) relative to untreated samples caused by chemical treatments when considering simultaneously all storage days ranged (log(10) cfu/g skin) from 0.53+/-0.83 (PA) to 1.98+/-0.62 (TSP) for mesophilic aerobic counts, from 0.11+/-0.89 (PA) to 1.27+/-1.02 (CA) (psychrotrophs), from 1.34+/-1.40 (PA) to 2.15+/-1.20 (CA) (Enterobacteriaceae), from 1.18+/-1.24 (PA) to 1.98+/-1.16 (CA) (coliforms), from 0.66+/-0.99 (PA) to 1.86+/-1.80 (TSP) (Micrococcaceae), from 0.54+/-0.74 (TSP) to 2.17+/-1.37 (CA) (enterococci), from 0.72+/-0.66 (TSP) to 2.08+/-1.60 (CA) (Brochothrix thermosphacta), from 0.78+/-1.02 (PA) to 1.99+/-0.96 (TSP) (pseudomonads), from 0.21+/-0.61 (PA) to 1.23+/-0.60 (TSP) (lactic acid bacteria), and from 1.14+/-0.89 (PA) to 1.45+/-0.61 (ASC) (moulds and yeasts). The microbial reductions throughout storage increased, decreased, or did not vary, in accordance with microbial group and chemical involved. Similar pH values were observed for untreated samples and for those dipped in PA and water on all sampling days. ASC-treated samples showed a lower pH than controls to day 1. TSP-treated legs exhibited the highest pH values and CA-treated ones the lowest, throughout storage. Hedonic evaluation (nine-point structured scale, untrained panellists) showed similar colour, smell and overall acceptability scores for dipped and untreated samples on day 0 and day 1. From day 3 sensorial attributes scored lower for untreated, PA- and water-dipped legs, as compared to legs treated with TSP, ASC and CA. Only for these three groups of samples were average scores higher than 6 (shelf-life limit value) observed by the end of storage. Results from the present study suggest that the treatments tested improve the microbial quality of chicken without adverse sensorial effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17320231     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  12 in total

1.  Effects of polyphosphate additives on Campylobacter survival in processed chicken exudates.

Authors:  Nereus W Gunther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to organic acids and monoacylglycerols.

Authors:  Z Molatová; E Skrivanová; B Macias; N R McEwan; P Brezina; M Marounek
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  The effect of rosemary extract and lactic acid on the quality of refrigerated broiler fillets.

Authors:  Mohamed A Hussein; Waleed R El-Ghareeb; Mohammed A F Nasr
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  The inhibitory effect of natural bioactives on the growth of pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Ji-Sun Kim; Yangha Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  Adaptation and cross-adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica to poultry decontaminants.

Authors:  Alicia Alonso-Hernando; Rosa Capita; Miguel Prieto; Carlos Alonso-Calleja
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh Meat from Iberian Pigs as Affected by a New Form of Presentation of Oleic Acid and an Organic-Acid Mix in the Diet.

Authors:  Ceferina Vieira; Ainhoa Sarmiento-García; Juan-José García; Begoña Rubio; Beatriz Martínez
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Detection of Salmonella species in chicken carcasses using genus specific primer belong to invA gene in Sohag city, Egypt.

Authors:  Nahed Mahmoud Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-10-22

Review 8.  Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics.

Authors:  Amélie Rouger; Odile Tresse; Monique Zagorec
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-08-25

9.  Microbiome Profiles of Commercial Broilers Through Evisceration and Immersion Chilling During Poultry Slaughter and the Identification of Potential Indicator Microorganisms.

Authors:  John A Handley; Si Hong Park; Sun Ae Kim; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Microbial load and antibiotic resistance in raw beef preparations from northwest Spain.

Authors:  María González-Gutiérrez; Camino García-Fernández; Carlos Alonso-Calleja; Rosa Capita
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.