Literature DB >> 17320121

Dissociaton of conditioned eye and limb responses in the cerebellar interpositus.

S Mojtahedian1, D R Kogan, S A Kanzawa, R F Thompson, D G Lavond.   

Abstract

Thompson and colleagues have demonstrated that the lateral interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum is the essential locus for the classical conditioning of the somatic eyeblink response. Preliminary studies reported that lesioning the cerebellar interpositus nucleus ipsilateral to the side of training also appears to abolish conditioned limb flexion responses. Previous studies have suggested that the interpositus nucleus is somatotopically organized with the eye being represented laterally and the hindlimb medially. Presently, we employed a double dissociation paradigm to examine the effects of muscimol (a GABA(A) agonist) injections on eyeblink versus limb flexion conditioned responses in the ipsilateral cerebellar interpositus nucleus of New Zealand white rabbits. For eyeblink conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) was a 14-V lamp bulb and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was a 3-psi corneal airpuff to the left eye. For limb flexion conditioning, the CS was a 1-kHz, 85-95 dB SPL tone and the US was a 3- to 5-mA shock to the upper left hindlimb. Upon training on both responses to a 60-100% criterion, the rabbits were then tested on eyeblink and limb flexion responses after injections of muscimol (0.1-0.3 mul of a 0.01- to 1.0-M solution) into either the lateral (eyeblink) or medial (limb flexion) interpositus nucleus. We have been able to successfully decrease or abolish the percent conditioned responses (CRs) of both the eyeblink and limb flexion conditioning selectively without affecting the other. These results thus lend further support for the notion of the existence of a somatotopic map in the interpositus nucleus for learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17320121     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  5 in total

1.  Cerebellar inhibitory output shapes the temporal dynamics of its somatosensory inferior olivary input.

Authors:  Roni Hogri; Eyal Segalis; Matti Mintz
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Changes in cerebellar intrinsic neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity result from eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Bernard G Schreurs
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Sensory system development influences the ontogeny of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Mary E Goldsberry; Magdalyn E Elkin; John H Freeman
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 5.  Cerebellar learning mechanisms.

Authors:  John H Freeman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.252

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.